• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

12 Year old sues dad for grounding her. Wins.

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
where... who... what... so.... ok... who the fuck is footing the bill for this case? what 12 year old can afford litigation?

on the flip side, i suppose the mother and father should be able to counter sue. the mother for labor pains and the father because the mother can no longer perform her "wifely" duties to the degree in which she used to.

we should gather everyone involved in this court case into a room and then drop a 500lb bomb on them. twice.

this is real right...? this is like... this is a real court case..?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
so... if a child divorces their parents, could they then force their parents to provide the lifestyle they were accustomed too while they were in their parents care? chalimoney as it were?

if this is the case, could this spawn a whole new branch of lawyer and legal agreement? for example, the prenatal nuptial? who would sign the agreement? the sperm, egg, or fetus? or would all 3 parties have to sign as they are all different entities at certain portions of the pregnancy? im guessing a squiggly line to indicate "tbd" under the name section would be acceptable...
 
Upvote 0
ggvier.gif


The court has just recieved a petition on behalf of Mr. Gary Glitter, who informed the court that if custody is granted to him, he will assist and vehemently support her right to publish inappropriate web postings.
 
Upvote 0
MililaniBuckeye;1187719; said:
So, you think she's OK in disobeying her father and posting "inappropriate" photos of herself? Seriously?
Click to expand...

Of course I don't think it's okay, but it's the kind of stupid shit I expect from a kid. The point was, I expect adults to be wiser than children - I hold them to a higher standard.
 
Upvote 0
From reading the article, which was sparse, one could reasonably infer that the court did not have a problem so much with the fact that the father wanted to discipline his daughter, rather than the actual punishment itself--not allowing her to go on a field trip with the school, and perhaps making her be truant to school.
 
Upvote 0
All of the articles you get from a Google search on this are really vague, but some of them infer that the parents are divorced and the child is now living with the mother. I don't know the first thing about the Canadian court system, but the ONLY thing I can think of that would give the court cause for review is some sort of custody dispute. One article mentions, for instance, that at the time of the punishment the girl was living with her father, who has legal custody, but after the dispute and despite the fact that her father still had legal custody, was living with her mother. I wonder if this is an issue where the father wanted to enforce his punishment and the mother, who the kid was actually living with, said she could do as she wished. Either way, I don't know why a court would even hear the case.
 
Upvote 0
JohnnyCockfight;1188098; said:
From reading the article, which was sparse, one could reasonably infer that the court did not have a problem so much with the fact that the father wanted to discipline his daughter, rather than the actual punishment itself--not allowing her to go on a field trip with the school, and perhaps making her be truant to school.
Click to expand...

I think you're really reaching trying to find some sanity in a ridiculous situation. She was grounded, and a court actually heard her case, with a real attorney and a real judge. That's nuts.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top