sammyjenkis
Hall of Fame
There is some walking back of calling every possible targeting play based on the presence of "indicators," and conference games are regularly protecting their contenders. I think the no-targeting call is correct from how want the play officiated. There was no intent to injure and no injury - and the play was made by one of the best and most respected college players making a play based on where the receiver would have been if it was a catchable ball. The ball was so high that the receiver turned but didn't jump to make a play on the ball. Downs in my opinion thought the receiver would actually jump to attempt a catch. Also, if the offensive player doesn't attempt to receive the ball - why would be granted protection as a defenseless receiver? He was just a defenseless observer of an errant pass.
	
		
			
		
		
	
				
			
		
		Upvote
		
		
		0