• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

Dispatch Chat: Update 1/15

osugrad21

Capo Regime
Staff member
Dispatch

Transcript of OSU football online chat with Tim May
The Columbus Dispatch
Friday, September 15, 2006 1:15 PM

Log on to Dispatch.com/buckeyes or BuckeyeXtra.com/buckeyes every Friday at noon during Ohio State's football season for a live chat with either Ken Gordon or Tim May, OSU football reporters for The Dispatch.
Below is a transcript of Tim's chat before the Buckeyes' game against Cincinnati:
Moderator: Welcome to the Dispatch.com/BuckeyeXtra.com Ohio State football question-and-answer session with OSU football reporter Tim May. Our chat will begin in a few minutes.
How are the modifications to the WHAC going, and will this help with our current recruits and their parents? -- Jim C.
Tim: Only time will tell if it is helps with recruiting, the nearly $20 million renovation being done to the Woody Hayes Athletic Center. The way I understand it, the project is on schedule, the players already are using the locker room and the meeting rooms. Most of the extra stuff, like the expanded weight room and players lounge, etc., won't be completed until early next year. But in short, it's all about keeping up with, and perhaps a little ahead of, the Jonses.
We start Big Ten play after the Cincinnati game on Saturday. Have any other teams in the Big Ten impressed you with their out-of-conference play? -- G.B. in Cleveland
Tim: G.B., first of all, is G.B., short for Green Bay? Were you named after your father's favorite NFL team? Pardon me, but I was just stalling. No. That's my answer. But it can be yes after Saturday if Michigan makes an honorable showing at Notre Dame, if Michigan State dumps Pitt and if Iowa handles Iowa State. Iowa's struggle last week without Drew Tate was to be expected, but my goodness -- Syracuse stunk last year. And Northwestern losing by 17 at home to Division I-AA New Hampshire? I know NH has a strong program, but are you kidding me?
I couldn't tell by watching TV, and of course the idiots in the booth never mentioned it, so what was your impression of the Ohio State fans' presence at the Texas game? Was there a noticeable amount of scarlet and gray in the stands? -- Susan, stuck in Ann Arbor
Tim: No. 1, forget this chat and call a tow-truck company -- see if Bo's Tows is still in operation. As for the OSU crowd at Texas, as I walked in the gate with our sports editor, Ray Stein, I talked with two OSU-clad fans who had paid $450 each for tickets. What I'm getting to is the OSU wedged in the NW end zone was packed, starting with the band; there were a couple of other pockets of scarlet, and then the rest of the crowd was peppered with the stuff. We guessed there might have been 8,000 to 10,000 OSU fans in total.
Would Ohio State ever consider playing Cincinnati in Paul Brown Stadium or maybe a MAC team in Cleveland Browns Stadium? Thanks. -- Allie in Toledo
Tim: Pssst, Allie, the Buckeyes are playing Toledo in Browns Stadium in 2009. They have played Cincinnati in Paul Brown Stadium. Don't you remember the near-miss they had down there in the national championship season of 2002? There's a chance they could play there again, but nothing is concrete yet.
Would tOSU have beaten UT with Zwick at QB? -- Scott L. in Bozeman, Mont.
Tim: Who knows? You had to be impressed with OSU's plan, though, rolling Troy Smith away from the pressure, clawing at the Longhorns' belly with the flips to Anthony Gonzalez early, then going over the top to Ted Ginn Jr. late. Texas admitted it loaded up expecting more running from Smith. Whether that would have changed with Zwick in the game we'll never know. But as Jesse Jackson said on Saturday Night Live, "The question is moot."
Everyone knew that OSU's defense had to improve between the NIU game and Texas -- clearly they did -- but by how much? What are the lingering concerns, especially against the run? -- Sam O.
Tim: The lingering concern is just that: Can the Buckeyes consistently stop the run? People are quickly referring to it as a bend-don't-break defense, but from this vantage point it's been a bend-break-their-back-with-a-big-turnover-return defense. It's still a young unit, though, and they are playing so many guys it's tough to get that chemistry right off the bat. And then here comes Cincinnati, averaging less than a football field rushing in its first two games. I'm not sure there will be a clear answer from this game.
Can you tell me anything about the new quarterback recruit from Georgia? -- Butch in Atlanta
Tim: For one thing, Antonio Henton is bigger than I envisioned him when the Buckeyes signed him in February. He has those stout legs like Troy Smith. In fact, many who have watched him in practice say he reminds them of Smith, i.e., in both his running and passing potential. He's quick and fast, and he throws a snap spiral. Other than that, he is spending a red-shirt season, which should make spring drills interesting, considering he'll be competing with upperclassmen Todd Boeckman and Rob Schoenhoft in the race to replace.
Can you please explain the roughing-the-passer penalty on Richardson during the Texas game last week? I don't think this call was given its due in The Dispatch last week. Was there ever an explanation from the officiating crew? -- Mike in Westerville
Tim: Immediately after the game it proved to be irrelevant, due to the final score. But not given its due? I wrote about it in the Wednesday OSU notebook and the Friday notebook, and Ken Gordon and I touched on it I believe in our "Inside the Beat" column on Monday here on the Web. Bottom line, it looked like a high hit by Richardson on Colt McCoy, but appearances are deceiving. Couple that with the officials' obvious intent to protect QBs more this year, and voila. Besides, the referee was standing behind the QB, and, well, if you saw the 6-7, 285-pound Richardson bearing down on you, you might want to throw a flag, or throw in the towel, too.
I noticed that Troy Smith has not run much the past two games. What is the reason for this?
Tim: Easy. He hasn't had to. Plus, they've only called about six plays that involve the QB running, and about four have been options where they'd rather he pitch it anyway. Besides, why run when passing is so much fun? Keeping something in the tank for Big Ten opponents could never be considered a bad thing.
What the hell is wrong with Ken Gordon saying that if he wasn't being paid he wouldn't watch the Buckeyes play Cincinnati? -- Max D. in Columbus
Tim: There is noting wrong with him saying that. He said it -- actually, he typed it -- in our "Inside the Beat" column that appears on Buckeyextra.com on Mondays. He can say - uh, type - what he wants. This is America, man. As for me, I'd watch Tulane vs. North Texas if that was my only alternative for seeing a college football game on a given Saturday. Growing up, I'd actually go into slight depression once the football season was over. I counted the days until the first game of the year on television, and I'm talking about that old College All-Star game in Chicago, when a team of stars played the defending NFL champion in Soldier Field. A huge thunderstorm ended that game's run. Back to your point, though, I find Saturday's game intriguing from the standpoint I believe you learn as much about a so-called No.1 team in the country in games like this as you do in ones like the 24-7 win at No.2 Texas last week. Besides, you can't play Texas or Michigan or Penn State or Iowa every week.
How do you think Coach Tressel is perceived nationally? Do you think he is seen as one of the top two or three coaches in college football?
Tim: It depends on how you rate them. Are you talking about gurus, geniuses, fellows whose game plans are considered strident and edge-running? Then no. Are you talking about program builders, task masters, fellows who embrace all manner of doing things on the field and off? Then yes. As for the football part, I can think of only a handful of games where I thought Tressel and his staff were ill-prepared, at least from what was displayed on the field. Two of them were in the 2004 season in the losses at Northwestern and Iowa. I think he has proved without a doubt he is good in the rivalry game (4-1 vs. Michigan) and in the bowls (4-1), and that's about as good as it gets.
I read yesterday that Ohio State had three wins last year by 30 or more points. I think the reputation that Tressel has as a coach who always plays it close to the vest is inaccurate. Sure, he does that when he has to, but I think that since the middle of last season, he's shown he can open it up with the best of them. Granted, the Buckeyes aren't putting 50 points on the board every week, but what team does these days? Do you agree that Tressel is perceived incorrectly by the public (especially OSU fans)? -- Jimmy in Canal Fulton, Ohio
Tim: What I believe is Tressel, first and foremost, wants to get to the fourth quarter with a chance to win every game. Second, I can recall an interview I had with him soon after he arrived concerning his demands on a quarterback, and one of them was, when the big play is there, no matter when it's there, hit it. Texas fans bemoan that lost fumble near the goal line that Donald Washington returned to set up the Buckeyes' first TD last week. But look at the post Smith overthrew to a wide-open Ginn, and the post he just missed to an open Brian Hartline, and the slant that Anthony Gonzalez dropped that might have been another quick six. Giving your QB the right to throw the ball downtown is not the mark of a timid man.
I wonder if the way the quarterback at OSU holds the ball when handing off to a running back, with one hand stretched out and glaringly obvious, is an advantage to a defense. Rex Kern and some other Woody quarterbacks are probably appalled. -- Ted T. in Dayton
Tim: To be frank, I don't see much of a difference in the way they do it and the way the QBs at Texas or Southern Cal or Boise State do it. Besides, showing the ball blatantly is a good way to set up that play-action fake. As for the hazard, Justin Zwick's fumble in the opener as he reached to hand off to Chris Wells came because he tripped over the foot of pulling left guard Tim Schafer. That's the same "over" play the Buckeyes used to score their final touchdown last week at Texas.
I was in Austin and noticed that John Kerr was hardly on the field for the Buckeyes. I thought he was a starting linebacker. What gives? -- Michael C. in Sacramento, Calif.
Tim: Linebackers coach Luke Fickell said he actually apologized to Kerr about that. With the Buckeyes in the nickel defense a lot, there were fewer than 20 plays where the weak side linebacker was on the field, and Kerr sort of got lost in the rotation with Ross Homan. Many observers keep whispering it's only a matter of time before Homan becomes the starter there, but the coaches keep insisting they are pleased with Kerr and encouraged by the freshman Homan's fast warming after rising from Coldwater. Expect them both to play.
With all the people we are playing, where is Robert Rose in the rotation? Redshirt?
Tim: Tressel said last week that Rose is going to play, maybe a little, maybe a little more. There are a lot of fellows they are trying to roll into the rotation up there.
I've heard that Anthony Gonzalez is as fast as Ted Ginn Jr. Fact or fiction? -- Semancha in Boise, Idaho
Tim: I don't think we'll ever really know. Ginn said this week the two have never raced at Ohio State, that they race defensive backs. Both are fast, though. I think that is obvious. It's just that Ginn, with that magnificent stride, more looks the part.
How is the honorary captain chosen for the games? -- C.J. in Columbus
Tim: Tressel, or at least Tressel and his associates, pick them. Like this week, it's 2002 national championship quarterback Craig Krenzel, who is back in town working in private business and doing some radio work for WTVN. It's an interesting concept. Tressel believes in keeping things modern while also making sure his current players are well aware of the past, and thus their responsibility.
Were you surprised by how easily Notre Dame tore apart Penn State? -- Jerry A. in Austin, Texas
Tim: Yes. Oh, you want more than that. OK, what I learned from the result is the Notre Dame defensive renaissance is real; PSU quarterback Anthony Morelli has a ways to go; Penn State has not simply reloaded after last year's surprising run to the Big Ten title; if JoePa was hoping to go out in a blaze of glory, there's a good chance he missed his chariot.
Do you feel that the Buckeyes will have a letdown tomorrow? If so, do you think it will be enough for UC to pull off a major upset? -- Steve F. in Columbus
Tim: I mean this in all sincerity -- if the Buckeyes win a close one, I wouldn't be surprised to hear them say there was a letdown. If they win a blowout, I wouldn't be surprised to hear them say they weren't looking ahead or behind. My point is, a play can go this way or that way and turn what's supposed to a tight game into a blowout, or what was supposed to be a blowout into a tight game. Like Texas last week -- did the Longhorns have a letdown? That said, there are so many jobs still up for grabs, especially on defense, I don't know how there could be a letdown.
Other than Michigan, which remaining opponent do you think presents the biggest threat to OSU? -- Antonio in Boston
Tim: Iowa on the road is a threat, believe it. And Michigan State on the road is, too. The Spartans had the Buckeyes right where they wanted them last year before that fiasco of a field-goal attempt -- too few players on the field -- was blocked and returned for a TD by Ashton Youboty. That MSU offense is going to give anybody trouble.
When our defense returns to top five next year, will Tressel revert to his old, predictable ways on offense? -- Peter in New York
Tim: Look at it this way: not only will he have a veteran defense, but he'll have a first-year starter at quarterback, at least three new starters on the line, possibly the loss of Ted Ginn Jr early to the pros, the loss of starting fullback Stan White Jr. Predictable might not be the right way of putting it, but "walk before you can run" might be.
Moderator: Time to wrap it up. Thanks, Tim. Nice job by you and our readers. As always, thanks for the time, and please pass along our sympathy to Ken for having to head out to the 'Shoe tomorrow.
 
Dispatch

Inside the Beat
Looking ahead to Big Ten play
By Tim May and Ken Gordon
The Columbus Dispatch
Monday, September 18, 2006

The Buckeyes are 3-0, ranked No. 1 in the country and appear to be clicking in every phase of the game. But now Big Ten play starts, and OSU will have to survive Penn State and Iowa to truly make this a September to remember. Dispatch beat reporters Ken Gordon and Tim May assess where the Buckeyes stand.
GORDON: Tim, I think the first thing on my mind is whether OSU has answered all of its defensive question marks yet. Even after that win at Texas, there was some concern over the run defense. I'm certainly not down on the D, but I don't think Cincinnati really gave the Buckeyes a true measuring stick, since the Bearcats don't have a solid run game. Tony Hunt and Penn State should be a better test of whether the Buckeyes have tightened down.
MAY: No question about that. The athletic ability of the opponent rises across the board again this week, but not to the level of Texas. Counting the eight sacks the Buckeyes held the Bearcats to minus yards rushing. That's no fluke. That's against a team that game-planned against them all week, that ran the zone play some like Texas did, but to no avail. When a team's defensive tackle is having the game that Quinn Pitcock had on Saturday, though, it changes everything for the opposing offense. He was considered one of the top five defensive tackles coming out of high school five years ago, and he has lived up to that billing.
GORDON: Actually, I'm more impressed with the personality this unit is developing. Two things stand out: They don't panic when teams move on them early, and they adjust well. Opponents have scored just nine second-half points this year, all in the opener. And No. 2, the ball-hawking back seven. They have six takeaways already, half of what they recorded all last season. That's huge. Any single player really surprised you this season yet, Tim? I think Anderson Russell has emerged from a pack of talented youngsters on defense, personally.
MAY: We all thought James Laurinaitis had the potential, but moving him to the middle where he can be at the heart of it all was one of those coaching genius moves (though Jim Heacock and Luke Fickell aren't into being called anything other than coach). Back to your point, though, Brandon Mitchell is having one of those senior seasons that Jim Tressel demands. That is, he is playing his best ball in his last go-round. The OSU defense as designed by Heacock demands strong, smart, dynamic safety play, and the Buckeyes are getting that from Russell and Mitchell.
GORDON: Let's look ahead to Penn State. Some say the Nittany Lions don't deserve their No. 24 ranking, with rather sluggish wins over Akron and Youngstown State and a thumping at the hands of Notre Dame. You know they're going to bring a physical game on both front lines. Can their defense, featuring LB Paul Posluszny, hold down OSU's multi-dimensional offense? That, to me, is the best matchup this week.
MAY: Agreed. The Nittany Lions could not throttle Notre Dame two weeks ago on the road. With a first-year starting quarterback, the offense still seems to be in search of a new identity compared to last year's unit dominated by the running/throwing of Michael Robinson. It's curious how Derrick Williams has been rather quiet this year, compared to last year, when he burst onto the scene as a freshman, even scoring that big touchdown against the Buckeyes. Whether he and Posluszny are totally back from their catastrophic injuries of last season is up to debate, but they were the Nits' sparks.
GORDON: One thing is certain, the next two weeks are crucial. OSU gets Penn State and then Iowa on the road at night. Winning those two games gives them major strength-of-schedule credibility and puts them in the driver's seat for a Big Ten title, even though we both feel the Oct. 14 road trip to Michigan State will be a stern test. The next four games are soft, and then it's Michigan at home. The way it looks, that could be a matchup of unbeatens, maybe No. 1 vs. No. 4, or something like that -- shades of 1968? Hey, the Buckeyes take it one game at a time, but we don't have to, do we?
MAY: No, we don't. But as the first quarter against Cincinnati proved, college football is full of surprises, and especially when the big boys play. The difference can be one bad kick here, one blown coverage there, and suddenly you've got yourself a ball game. Penn State has high-quality players, unless the recruiting experts are full of hot air, so it might just be a matter of time before it starts clicking this year. Ohio State is a team full of newbies, too, but a team whose time has come, according to the poll voters. Saturday should serve as a fine measuring stick, because now every team in the Big Ten is starting anew in a way, with a league title and its accompanying BCS Rose Bowl berth on the line.
 
Upvote 0
Scarlet-and-gray Q&A
Transcript of OSU football online chat with Ken Gordon
The Columbus Dispatch
Friday, September 22, 2006 1:07 PM

Log on to Dispatch.com/buckeyes or BuckeyeXtra.com/buckeyes every Friday at noon during Ohio State's football season for a live chat with either Ken Gordon or Tim May, OSU football reporters for The Dispatch.

Below is a transcript of Ken Gordon's chat before the Buckeyes' game against Penn State:

Maurice Wells seems like a risk every time he enters the game. He certainly does not seem to be living up to expectations. Why doesn't OSU just play Pittman and Chris Wells? -- Nick A. in Dublin

Ken: A risk for what? I'd say when he gets the ball between the tackles, he's a risk for 2 or 3 yards. I agree with you there, that's not his role. But I'd say if you pitch out to him, he's a risk to turn the corner. And if you throw the ball to him in space, he's a risk for a big play, like his 30-yard reception against Northern Illinois. You aren't off base here, I don't see Wells as an every-down, traditional back. I do think he's perfect as a change-of-pace, third-down type of player and therefore valuable.

Like I have said the previous three weeks, I think the defense will be all right -- as long as they continue to improve. What do you see as the area that most needs the most improvment? -- Paul in Columbus

Ken: Ah, our first "I told you so" about the defense! Run defense will remain a question mark until they stop a team that has a good back. Last week doesn't count, as Cincinnati barely even tried to run, and I think taking sack yards off the rush totals is the worst stat in college football (the NFL does it right). Anyway, let's see how OSU fares against Tony Hunt and the Penn State o-line. I'm not down on this defense, but it will face some major tests in the coming weeks.

I read in the paper today that Lydell Ross sold his national-championship ring, and I think that's disgraceful that someone would have so little regard for such a great achievement. Do you agree? -- Marla in Obetz

Ken: Disgraceful is too strong a word to me. At first blush, yes, it's surprising. If it were me, I'd cherish not only the title, but the symbol of achieving something with my teammates. But that's me. Maybe Lydell has other ways of remembering that season that mean more to him. Maybe he's in financial trouble. We don't know, and I'm not one to judge harshly, anyway.

Why doesn't Ohio State use any trick plays? It might help, because other teams know Ohio State never does anything fancy. A trick here and there might result in some big yardage. -- Joe in Bellaire, Ohio

Ken: Not to sound snide, but OSU's "nothing fancy" offense seems to be resulting in some big yardage.The Buckeyes are 18th nationally in yardage (426.7) and 30th in scoring (32.0). So it's not like they're looking for something to get them unstuck. Also, since Ted Ginn Jr.'s freshman season, he's been getting stuffed on end-arounds more often than not. OSU tried one last Saturday and he lost 6 yards. I would say that defending an offense that features a mobile quarterback, two or three good running backs, about six legitimate receivers, a solid tight end and a very good offensive line is tricky enough.

Beanie Wells' number of carries through the first three games are 10, 5 and 5. Why is he seeing less action as the season progresses instead of more? I'd have thought that by the time we reached Game 4, he'd be a bigger part of the offense. -- Adam in Hilton Head, S.C.

Ken: Actually, I've been saying all along that Antonio Pittman is the clear-cut starter. What that usually means is that as the games get tougher, the starter carries more of the load. Against Texas, I think OSU coaches worried the pressure might be too much for Beanie, plus he had fumbled in the opener. Last week, I thought he played a decent amount, and remember, they threw him a 10-yard pass, as well. As the Big Ten opens, I think we'll continue to see Beanie for a series or two a game to spell Pittman and keep him as fresh as possible. But remember, it's Pittman who is the centerpiece of the running attack, whether fans agree with it or not. Tressel has said he would ideally split the carries 50 percent Pittman, 25 percent Wells and Mo Wells. That's pretty clear.

If even (Penn State linebacker) Paul Posluszny admits that A.J. Hawk should have won the Butkus Award last season, it just makes me wonder how such a mistake could have been made that Posluszny was voted the award. Have you heard anything behind the scenes that could shed light on how that happened? Did Hawk have a bad rep that voters didn't like (or something like that?). Thanks! -- Morris D. in Hackensack, N.J.

Ken: Blame you east-coasters! No, seriously, the Butkus voting pool is small (I believe 50 people, but I'm not positive). Every vote counts a lot, and from what I hear, Posluszny won by one vote. Compare that to the Lombardi, which Hawk won, and which has hundreds of voters. So I don't know. I'm not much for conspiracy theories. Maybe voters were jealous of Hawk for dating Laura Quinn?

Which player is the best interview on the team? (And you can't say Anthony Gonzalez). -- Scott L. in Bozeman, Mont.

Ken: Why can't I say Anthony Gonzalez? Because he is, by far. The beautiful thing about Gonzo is how well-rounded he is. You could ask him about the price of bread in Morocco and he'd give you a thoughtful opinion, or at least a funny quip. No Gonzo? Man, you know how to hurt a guy. OK, here are some others I love to talk to: QBs coach Joe Daniels, guard T.J. Downing, tackle Kirk Barton and QB Troy Smith, pre-2006. Smith used to be wonderfully candid but now is drearingly politically correct. It's even worse because you know he's got these great thoughts, but he holds them back. I've covered NFL and college football now for eight years, and without a doubt, the offensive line as a position are the best interviews.

The papers out here have already put USC in the national-championship game against the Buckeyes. Although history has shown that the Buckeyes have some serious hurdles to overcome to get there (Penn State, Iowa at night and those guys from up north), do you think the Pac Ten is that tough this year, and is USC the cream of that crop? -- Bob Z. in Yorba Linda, Calif.

Ken: No doubt, the Trojans are the class of the Pac 10. Oregon should have lost to Oklahoma last week, and I don't see another top-15 caliber team in the mix. USC showed me something with how it stood up to a very physical Nebraska team. The Trojans can hit, they're not just west-coast finesse. USC hosts Notre Dame on Nov. 25, that should determine the BCS title-game matchup. But heck, if the papers already have it figured out, let's just skip all the preliminaries and go to Arizona now. A lot less work for me!

Anything on the grapevine about who might be leaving early for the NFL? I know, I know: Enjoy the moment. But I keep thinking about how awesome it would be to have Ted and Gonzo back. It might be tough next year with a new QB and losing anyone early. -- Bill in Williamsport, Pa.

Ken: I would be surprised if Ginn Jr. was back and would be equally surprised if Anthony Gonzalez wasn't. That's not on the grapevine, it's off the top of my head. Ginn Jr. will be a first-round pick, and the vast majority of those guys go pro early, particularly if the Buckeyes happen to win a title. Gonzalez could do nothing but help himself in the draft by coming back in 2007 with Ginn gone and he would be the top option. Now I'll throw a name out there that you haven't, and that's Antonio Pittman. If he has a big year, he may go, because Chris Wells will continue to steal carries from him and his numbers could suffer in 2007. Putting up back-to-back 1,300-yard or more seasons should land Pittman an early draft slot, I would think. The only other remote possibility would be right tackle Kirk Barton, who some are saying has All-America potential, but I see him returning. And one other thing: Enjoy the moment.

Is there any way we CANNOT have Brent Musberger announce any OSU games? He is the most negative announcer about OSU there is. I have to turn the sound off the TV and listen to the radio. -- Mary C. from Columbus

Ken: Wow, really? Years ago, I think you may have been right, Brent always seemed to doubt OSU's chances. But now, heck, I think he loves Ohio State, which he shouldn't do, either, by the way. During the Texas game, all he did was shower praise on Tressel, Smith, Ginn, etc. I'm not sure what you're listening to. Now, the radio guys are buddies of mine, so I have no problem with anyone choosing to listen to them. But remember: I believe OSU has the right of refusal on who announces its games, so you're not going to get the same potential for pointed criticism as you would from an outside network broadcast.

Why has Troy Smith stopped running the ball? -- Susan in Mount Vernon, Ohio

Ken: Interesting question, one the media has asked Troy and Tressel about for the past two weeks. Sifting through their answers, here's my opinion: 1. Troy is dead-set intent on proving he can be a pocket passer, partly looking ahead to his NFL draft stock. He has always fought the stereotype of being an "athlete" who plays quarterback. And 2., he will run, eventually. I think OSU is thrilled it is 3-0 without having to risk Troy's health running around. But I can't see them ignoring such an important part of their offense all year. This guy scored 11 rushing TDs last year, after all. My opinion, just when teams start forgetting to account for Smith scrambling, he'll burn someone, big-time.

What has happened to young defensive ends (Lawrence) Wilson and (Doug) Worthington? I have not seen or heard about them for awhile. -- Alan R. in Brightom, Mich

Ken: Wilson is playing a lot in OSU's five-man rotation at both end spots. In fact, he batted down a Dustin Grutza pass at the line and later sacked Grutza last week. He was held back a bit by an injury in fall camp, but seems to be OK now. The coaches like him a lot. Worthington is coming off a serious knee injury suffered in bowl practice last December. He has dressed for games but I don't believe he has played. When he comes back, in future seasons look for he and freshman end Walter Dublin to form the "all-suburb" tandem. Get it, Worthington and Dublin?

Do you think Joe Paterno should retire? -- Max A. in Pittsburgh

Ken: Nope. The man stands for all that is good and right about college football, and the longer he stays in the game, the more he might influence a younger coach to do the same. Too many schools chase TV money, too many coaches promise a recruit they'll stay, then contract-hop at the first opportunity. All Joe does is graduate players, give millions of dollars to his school and community, and oh by the way, he came within one play of being undefeated last year. He can drop dead in his office at age 102, in my view.

Do you feel the university let Maurice Clarett down by not providing closer scrutiny on an 18-year-old freshman?

Ken: Oh man, this is a chat, not a sociology thesis. My 30-second version is if you invite a snake into your bed, you're going to get bitten. I think Jim Tressel learned a valuable lesson from Maurice, which is it's not worth recruiting questionable characters. Since then, the players he's brought in have been markedly better people, at least from my limited exposure to them. I don't feel it's the university's job to provide closer scrutiny, I believe it's Tressel's job to screen applicants better, so to speak. And I think since 2003, he has done that.

How much of an advantage would a rainy day be to Penn State tomorrow? -- Sid in Greensburg, Ohio

Ken: I think it would be a wash (look out, I love cheesy puns). Seriously, this is not the same type of Penn State team as even five years ago. They have some speedy receivers and they try and throw the ball downfield a lot. I also think OSU matches up pretty well across both front lines, so there's no clear-cut edge if it's a grubby, smash-mouth game. Honestly, I don't see rain playing much of a role in who wins.

What happened to Sirjo Welch, who played on special teams last year?

Ken: The Beechcroft graduate was in academic hot water and did not get his grades in order until the end of summer quarter, three weeks into fall camp. He did not return to the team, and I don't know what his plans are. He did not enroll at Ashland University, as was rumored.

Since Rob Oller is probably too afraid to do chats, I'll ask you: Does he really think he's funny in the Scarlet and Gray Matter on Sundays? Why is he allowed to take cheap shots in that thing? -- John D. in Austin, Texas

Ken: Did this one sneak by our moderator, or what? Rob Oller would love to do chats, I'm sure, and he would be really good at them. It just so happens we decided to start our foray into this with our OSU beat writers. Scarlet and Gray Matter is one of our most popular features on Sundays, actually. That and the Bottom Line. Now, since you're from Austin, wasn't that the paper in which John Kelso (forgive me if I have the wrong writer) wrote two or three columns making fun of the whole state of Ohio? Something about Miss Ohio and pigs? All sorts of other completely inane, uncalled for slams? Man, I'm sorry if at some point in history, Texas had problems with boosters. OSU has, too. Tell Kelso to take a shot at that subject next time and leave the 11 million good people of this state alone.

Moderator: Well, now that we've destroyed all the goodwill built up between Texas and Ohio, let's wrap this up. As always, thanks for taking the time to hang with the readership, Ken. Enjoy the Big Ten opener tomorrow, and tell JoePa that Harry Caray wants his glasses back.

http://www.columbusdispatch.com/football/football.php?story=214303
 
Upvote 0
Dispatch

9/29

Web Xtra
Transcript of OSU football online chat with Tim May
The Columbus Dispatch
Friday, September 29, 2006 1:12 PM

Log on to Dispatch.com/buckeyes or BuckeyeXtra.com/buckeyes every Friday at noon during Ohio State's football season for a live chat with either Ken Gordon or Tim May, OSU football reporters for The Dispatch.
Below is a transcript of Tim's chat before the Buckeyes' game against Iowa:
So we're four games into the season. Who do you think will be playing for the national title come January? -- Brooke in Fargo, N.D.
Tim: Most crystal balls are partly cloudy at the moment, because there is no dominant team this season, not even No.1 Ohio State. Based on what I've seen, though, Southern Cal is rounding back into shape (as in a monster) again; if Texas gets past Oklahoma, look out; Auburn proved last night in escaping South Carolina that it is not head and shoulders above the rest of the Southeastern Conference; etc. It's hard to say right now, but if Ohio State and Michigan are both undefeated going into Nov.18, I definitely could see the winner playing in the title game. It goes the same in the SEC -- if Florida, Auburn or Georgia run the table, look out. But what if the Big Ten, SEC, Big 12, Pac-10, Big East and Atlantic Coast (don't sleep on Virginia Tech) all produce undefeated champs? You won't want to be anywhere close to that shoving match.
Do you think that OSU coaches tend to call plays too conservatively? I cringe when I see run after run on first down, and see talented receivers going to waste. I also think that cautiousness can lose games. -- David S.
Tim: Funny, but I think they have been more aggressive than ever, with the exception of when the rain was pounding last week. I even asked Jim Tressel this week something I never thought I would, whether he thought his team, with a 1,331-yard rusher back in Antonio Pittman, was running enough. Spreading the field, occasionally going vertical, and with five receivers sometimes in the pattern, no, I don't think they are any more conservative than any other team in the top 10 at the moment.
Why the heck does Antonio Pittman get no love nationally? -- Rugarhashi W. in Columbus
Tim: Good question. Wish I had the answer. His problem, PR wise, is he is in the same backfield with one of the leading Heisman contenders in quarterback Troy Smith. And, for instance, which play gained more replay last week, Pittman's hard-fought 12-yard run for his TD, or Smith's scrambling TD pass to Brian Robiskie? There, I think we just answered your question in a nutshell.
If you're coaching a college football team this year, which of the following QBs do you want starting for you: Troy Smith, Iowa's Drew Tate or Michigan State's Drew Stanton? -- Larry in Iowa City, Iowa
Tim: After watching Stanton melt in the rain last week against Notre Dame, not him. After watching Tate lose his cool and spike the ball in the lopsided loss in Ohio Stadium last year, not him. Guess that just leaves one, right? Smith has delivered on the big stage against Michigan twice, against Notre Dame in the Fiesta Bowl, and on the road at Texas three weeks ago in about as rarefied an atmosphere as you'll find. And remember, this season he has yet to run and really mean it.
I notice that something is a little off on offense. The talk is that Troy Smith is maturing as a QB, and that's a very good thing. But what the game against Penn state showed me is that Troy is not playing HIS game; he's playing Tressel's game, which could be a problem down the road. Troy said that he stepped outside of Tressel's box and improvised on the TD throw to Robiskie. With Troy's maturity, speed, wits, feet and arm, I think a championship team is in the making if he could do HIS thing. Thoughts?
Tim: You took up most of the space, so I'll be brief. Troy Smith always has the green light to run. As for his stepping outside of "Tressel's box," no coach likes to see his QB reverse field because, among other reasons, whatever was chasing him suddenly could be in his face. Each season most every offense goes through a growing period of figuring out what it does best, and what it can do when what it does best is taken away by the opposing defense. I think you saw a little of that the past two weeks.
At this point in the season, how do you feel about the rule changes regarding the clock, and what do you think the chances are that these rules undergo more changes next year? -- Chad G. in Westerville
Tim: Any time you cut the number of plays, and there has been about an 8 percent to 10 percent drop, you're cheapening the product. Like when a hamburger joint goes from 1/3 pound burgers to 1/4 pounders "but they're still cooked with tender loving care." That's what the powers-that-be have tried to tell us, that one reason for the shorter games is meant to lessen the toll on players over a 12-game regular season. Funny, but the last time Ohio State won the national title, in 2002, it went 14-0 under the old rules. As I have said time and again, if they want to shorten the games, take out four of the TV timeouts. But, no, that's messing with the "revenue stream," and you don't want to go there. Because it was on the banks of the revenue stream where Twlevegamesville was founded.
Would you agree that our young defense faces its first "real" test this week against a veteran QB? No disrespect to Texas or PSU, but the inexperience of their QBs showed. Tate is the real deal and gives reason to worry. -- Steve M.
Tim: Being completely honest, I'm not so sure. That Tate is the most experienced and dangerous QB the Buckeyes have faced this season goes without saying. But there is something strangely lukewarm about Iowa's attack, primarily that running back Albert Young and tight end Scott Chandler are its two leading receivers. And Young is averaging a mere 70 yards per game rushing. Maybe they haven't shown everything yet. Maybe their wide receivers are having problems. Maybe Tate is bothered more by that abdominal strain than we all know. For sure, we will find out in about 32 hours.
Why hasn't Ohio State established its running game? After four games played, we are 10th in the Big Ten in rushing! Would you agree that establishing the run early is essential to beating the teams with solid quarterbacks (Tate, Stanton, Henne) so we can limit their snaps?
Tim: No matter what you hear or read elsewhere, the biggest play in football is the touchdown. A TD, no matter how it comes or how fast it comes, immediately changes the dynamics of a game. The key with QBs such as Tate and Stanton, especially, is to make them predictable, to have much more of a clue of that they're up to when they go to the line. Taking a lead on them is the best way to get that. As for Henne, he is operating a more conventional offense, with a great running back (Michael Hart) and a big-time receiver (Mario Manningham). More to the point, you probably will see OSU run the ball more down the road, primarily because Antonio Pittman is a big-time back who has three 100-yard games in the first four.
I don't question play-calling, because I leave that to those who make a living out of doing it. I have wondered why we've not seen Troy Smith on a naked bootleg. Could it be that an athletic QB who is always a threat to run is by definition not a good candidate for this play?
Tim: No. You've seen him on naked boots, a few against Texas for sure. But when he sees Anthony Gonzalez or Brian Robiskie or Ted Ginn Jr. open down the field, he'd be foolish to tuck and run. Smith and Tate are as lethal as they come on the pass-run option off the naked, and I wouldn't be surprised to see some streaking going on Saturday night out there amidst the corn.
Can you hear Woody saying if it ain't broke don't fix it? Talk of changing to a new synthetic turf is just what the team up north would like. Have officials at OSU looked at the one-sided view of the fans on that matter on Buckeye Back Talk? It should be the players' decision, because the coaches and fans dont have to play on it. Agree or disagree? -- M.W. in Hillsboro, Ohio
Tim: I wholeheartedly disagree. It was Woody Hayes who pushed for the move to the rug in 1971, much to the dismay of many of his players then. But he saw a more predictable, consistent playing surface. As Jim Tressel has pointed out, nothing beats a great grass field. But there's nothing worse than a lousy one. OSU's field starts out pretty good, especially in the first year, but it deteriorates primarily because the sun starts getting lower in the sky as fall proceeds. There's two, sometimes three more home games after the harvest moon, for goodness sake. As for the new "in-fill'' artificial surfaces, I think they're pretty sweet.
Ken Gordon said a couple weeks ago that you don't like predicting scores of OSU games. Why? Scared? -- Milton in Alliance, Ohio
Tim: Scared? Of what? Besides, I have predicted some scores or spreads in the past. Like on Wall to Wall Sports (moderator's note: Sunday nights, WBNS-10TV in central Ohio), I said I thought Ohio State would beat Texas "by 10, 15 points or more," and I was pretty accurate. We don't pick games in The Dispatch for some reason, but if we did, I'd say Ohio State by 16 or more tomorrow in Iowa. How's that, uncle Milty?
What did you take away from Notre Dame's miracle comeback last week? Are the Irish pretty good, or once again, does Michigan State succeed only at underperforming? I swear, it wouldn't surprise me if Drew Stanton was on the take in that game. -- Larry in Xenia
Tim: I'm not going to touch the last part of that, because I think it's irresponsible throw out such a claim without proof. What I saw on Stanton's part was him having the ball ripped from him on one play, throwing a goofy pass under pressure on another and just trying to make something happen on his last interception that was as strange a play as you'll see. As for Notre Dame, it played offense when it ultimately had to, and the same went for the defense. But in big games, how can it do that all day long?
Last year we had two deep on punt returns. This season I have only seen a single return man. I believe we were much better with two deep than one. By having two, it forces the punter to pick the lesser of two "evils," and the other returner is there to help block. Is there a reason coach Tressel is using only one? I would like to see Ted and Gonzo or Ray Small do the returns. -- Bob K.
Tim: They put two deep on punt returns a lot the past two seasons, but not all the time. You're right, though, they have done it only a couple of times this season. It is obvious the Buckeyes are experimenting, sometimes jamming the opponents' "gunners" on the outside, sometimes backing off. I heard Chris Spielman on 1460 The Fan the other day criticizing that phase of the game for the Buckeyes, that just the simple blocking on returns could be better. I have to agree. I also thought you would have seen a couple or more blocked punts by now. Maybe that's coming; maybe sooner than later.
Does it seem strange to you that tomorrow will be only the second time they've played a night game at Iowa? What's up with that? -- Morgan on campus
Tim: Yes, especially since Muscatine, Iowa -- home base for the portable lighting company MUSCO -- is just about 40 miles from Iowa City. But several Big Ten schools -- Ohio State and Michigan included -- are diligent in protecting a primarily day-based start time for their games with the occasional exception. It's part tradition and part not wanting 100,000 people wandering through dimly lit parking lots at midnight while others are making a mad dash for the exit.
If Ohio State and Michigan continue to dominate their schedules and head to their finale ranked No. 1 and No. 2 as the nation's only unbeaten teams (ahead of a large field of once-beaten teams, including USC and Notre Dame) and they were to play a close, thrilling game that neither team could be embarrassed about, would there be any chance that they would both be selected to face off again for the BCS championship? -- Vince in Wurzburg, Germany
Tim: Mathematically there is a chance. Remember a few years ago when Oklahoma lost the Big 12 title game to Kansas State but still played in the national title game? That was the same year Ohio State beat Kansas State in the Fiesta Bowl. Do I see that happening this year? No. But it is so early into this season, who knows what the scene will look like on Nov.18. There could be four or five undefeated teams remaining, there could be none. I do know in my preseason picks I forecast OSU and Michigan to meet on Nov.18 with the Big Ten title on the line. I've seen no reason to change THAT prediction.
Ted Ginn seems to be in last year's midseason funk of going laterally on punts (if he doesn't drop it first) instead of running north and south. He got over that late last year and was a good punt-returner again. Did the coaches talk to him about that last year? Are they concerned this year? -- Jim in Clarksville, Tenn.
Tim: He is averaging 8.7 yards on 11 returns thus far. Opponents have punted 26 times, so they're obviously trying to avoid the test. He has done some dancing, but he also has plowed ahead a few times. It also appears the coverage teams are intent on making him go east-west. As for the coaches, I think they would like to see more blocking going on, frankly. Maybe they should put the starting defense out there with him, because they ran plenty of interference for Malcolm Jenkins on that interception return last week.
As a veteran newspaper writer,is it more fun covering a team that has a chance at a national title, or is it just a job no matter how the team does? -- Stacy in Knoxville, Tenn.
Tim: It's both. There is a definite buzz around a team when it is riding high. It's always interesting to watch how the players handle it, too, being in the spotlight and all that entails. As for the work, well, we don't have near the access to players or coaches that we had a decade ago. That has made interview situations much more of a rush experience and much less fun. And late games like the one Saturday night at Iowa? No one in the print media likes those at all. For instance, in our first edition Sunday we'll have stories that we wrote ahead of time, and then those will be replaced by stories we will write during and after the game. There is an adrenaline rush associated with that, I must admit, and it sure beats feeding chickens.
Moderator: Tim, another Big Eleven effort from you today. As always, thanks. Enjoy the trip to Iowa City, and tell the cornstalks we said hi.
 
Upvote 0
Dispatch

Inside the Beat
Other than 5-0, what do we know?
By Ken Gordon and Tim May
The Columbus Dispatch
Monday, October 2, 2006 11:15 AM

Coming off its second impressive night-time victory over a ranked opponent this season, the top-ranked Ohio State Buckeyes certainly appear to have shaken the post-sundown blues. What do we know about this team we didn't know five weeks ago? Dispatch beat reporters Tim May and Ken Gordon offer their thoughts as the Buckeyes turn toward nonconference foe Bowling Green:
MAY: The rise of several players on defense -- James Laurinaitis, Curtis Terry, Vernon Gholston, Antonio Smith, Brandon Mitchell -- is what sticks out to me. We all knew these fellows had talent, but watching the defense evolve so quickly into a big-play, turnover-grabbing unit has been a mild surprise. Defensive tackles David Patterson and Quinn Pitcock, and cornerback Malcolm Jenkins were known quantities, but everyone else had something to prove. Now they've done it on a couple of the toughest stages in the nation. It does appear they're a hit in prime time.
GORDON: No question, and you could even get some coaches to admit they're a bit surprised, as well. Coordinator Jim Heacock flat-out said he didn't expect Antonio Smith to play this well, for instance. But let's give Heacock and his staff some credit here, as well. I've always thought Heacock got more out of his talent than most other coaches. But he has devised schemes that play to OSU's strengths and minimize their weaknesses. If he's not a finalist for the Broyles Award (nation's top assistant coach) then they should just retire that honor. Offensively, there aren't as many surprises, because we knew how good they were, but I would count the emergence of Brian Robiskie as a solid No. 3 receiver as one.
MAY: Yes, then all of a sudden the fellow Robiskie had replaced, senior Roy Hall, steps up and makes a big-time touchdown catch at Iowa. Coming off a sprained ankle suffered in preseason, Hall might be ready to step forward as many had projected for his fifth year. In other words, just as some other teams are losing depth due to the rigors of the season, the Buckeyes are finding some on offense. Like the more involved role of freshman running back Chris "Beanie" Wells on Saturday night in relief of 100-yard rusher Antonio Pittman. Wells was just considered the top running back prospect in the country by some experts last year, that's all. Now he's starting to play like it.
GORDON: And to me, that's what the next six weeks are about for the Buckeyes now -- continue to develop depth, work on some things, get better. Tighten up the run defense. Reshuffle the secondary with the loss of free safety Anderson Russell to a knee injury. Things like that. Because let's face it, the next six opponents don't look very good compared with Texas, Penn State and Iowa. Michigan State is in disarray and suffering big injuries. About the only team of concern I see is Minnesota, which always has a dangerous offense.
MAY: As I said on Wall to Wall Sports last night, though, it's folly to sleep on anyone in major college football anymore. Just ask Michigan State, which was beaten by heavy underdog Illinois on Saturday. No matter what happened the week before in the fourth-quarter collapse against Notre Dame, no one saw that fall coming to Illinois. South Carolina, which had been shut out by Georgia and struggled with Mississippi State, almost upset Auburn on Thursday night. Lose too much edge and you can slip right onto your fanny. Any snow skier can tell you that.
GORDON: These days, the better analogy is a snowboarder. Dude, we're showing our age, like, you know? All right, let's assess Bowling Green for a moment. I see a team that's giving up 30 points a game and has played the likes of Buffalo and Florida International. (To be fair, they also faced Wisconsin). I see a team that looks like it has one dynamic player, ultraback Freddie Barnes, who is the leading rusher and also splits time at quarterback with Anthony Turner. I see this as being an ideal opponent coming after a tough road Big Ten game. A team with a few little wrinkles, just enough to keep OSU interested.
MAY: Hey, dude, the Olympic downhill is still one of the more exciting sporting events, period. They do that on skis. As for BG, it has wiped out a couple of times, especially to MAC foe Kent State. Then last week it dominated Ohio U. The Falcons have one of the nation's better running games, and one of the more abused defenses. They are young, especially on defense. And Ohio State is loaded, especially on offense. Uh-oh.
 
Upvote 0
Dispatch

Web Xtra
Transcript of OSU football online chat with Ken Gordon
The Columbus Dispatch
Friday, October 6, 2006 1:07 PM

Log on to Dispatch.com/buckeyes or BuckeyeXtra.com/buckeyes every Friday at noon during Ohio State's football season for a live chat with either Ken Gordon or Tim May, OSU football reporters for The Dispatch.
Below is a transcript of Ken's chat before the Buckeyes' game against Bowling Green:
Did the Big Ten "penalize" the officiating crew from the Iowa game for any of their mistakes? The overturned call on Ted Ginn's catch and no penalties called on Iowa players for several obvious infractions (punches thrown against Datish and spear of Ginn) were the most obvious mistakes. -- Andy in Melbourne, Fla.
Ken: No, to my knowledge, the Big Ten has not penalized or reprimanded any officiating crew this season. I have a hard time believing they overturned the Ginn catch. I personally didn't see the Datish incident, so I can't very well pass judgement on that play. I like coach Jim Tressel's philsophy on this: He doesn't believe he's ever won or lost a game because of the officiating. That's a good attitude.
I am a big fan of T.J. Downing on the offensive line. I notice that before most games he is always so focused and in a "special zone." How do players get into that "zone" type of mind-set where they can tune out all of the distractions and hype, especially just prior to a big game such as Texas was? -- Dave T. in Newport Beach, Calif.
Ken: I think it has something to do with his Mohawk haircut. He gets the sides of his head shaved just before each game, and by stimulating his scalp, it must release some adrenaline that causes T.J. to be able to do maintain focus. OK, I'm just goofing with you. I have no idea! Seriously, Downing listens to heavy-metal music to pump himself up in the locker room, and he's one intense dude just in general. I'm not inside his head during games, so I can't say for sure that he has blocked out all distractions and hype. I would assume it's a trait that all high-level athletes share, the ability to focus in the midst of pressure and chaos (pretty good Mohawk theory I had going there, huh?)
What is the biggest disappointment so far this year? I think it's a toss-up between Ted Ginn returning punts/kickoffs or Chris Wells running the ball. I expected better results in both cases.
Ken: I'm going to agree with you on Ginn and disagree on Wells. I don't think Ginn is doing anything wrong, but nothing has really happened for him ... yet. He doesn't seem to be dancing or running sideways like he was at points last year, but the lanes aren't there for him. He's doing a decent job of taking it straight upfield and getting whatever he can get. On Wells, I have repeatedly tried to tell fans that Antonio Pittman was going to be OSU's clear No. 1 back, and unless he got hurt, Wells was going to be a complementary back all season. That's exactly what's happening. Wells has looked pretty good when he's been in, but Pittman is Tressel's horse, people, get that straight. Sorry to snap, it's just getting frustrating to keep repeating this!
I've read quotes about the apparent cheap shot that an Iowa player gave Doug Datish, but nothing from Datish himself. Have you been able to get any response from him about the incident? -- George in Louisiana
Ken: No, because Datish has not been available to the media this week. Reporters have very little access to players, by coach Jim Tressel's design. We get a bunch of guys after the game, but at the time, we had no idea any incident might have occurred, so we didn't ask Datish about it. Then we were given seven players to interview on Tuesday and one Wednesday. Datish was not one of them. That's it until this Saturday. The only other option is to try to contact a player outside of specified interview times, and woe to the writer who gets caught doing that! I'm sure he'll be asked about it after the BGSU game tomorrow.
Are you of the opinion that the Heisman should go to college football's best player or to the best player on the best team that season? It seems that the latter is more true now than ever. -- Jimmy B. in Macon, Ga.
Ken: Now that's a good question. First, let's agree the Heisman goes to the best or most valuable quarterback or running back, because that's really what it is. Charles Woodson winning as a cornerback/punt returner for Michigan in 1997 was the very rare exception to the rule. I'd have to say it's the best QB or RB on one of the top 10 teams, not necessarily limited only to THE best team. But certainly, the winner is going to come off a team that is unbeaten or has one or two losses, tops, and is likely headed to a BCS bowl. It's certainly not going to the best player, because that player could be an offensive tackle, for all we know!
What is the structure for TV timeouts? Are they definitively established, or are they at the discretion of the officials or of some boob in the TV booth? What prevents them from disrupting the momentum of the game? -- Roger W. in Mount Vernon, Ohio
Ken: Good question, and I don't have a quick, easy answer. All I know for sure is TV has a designated number of breaks they need to squeeze in per game. If there is a long drive with no chance for a break, you generally get more commercials later to make up for it. I believe there is a "TV official" on the sideline who communicates with someone upstairs in the booth and signals the referee when a TV timeout is going to be taken. But you're talking to a writer who has never wanted to learn all the TV nuances, so it's strictly my best guess here. I have a face for newspapers!
There was a lot of discussion of how many players saw action at Texas and in other early games. Did that pattern continue or did the coaches substitute less frequently throughout the game at Iowa? -- Greg in Cincinnati
Ken: The backup offensive line got in for a series in every game but Iowa so far. Coach Jim Tressel said they planned for it at Iowa, too, but the situation never arose (OSU was backed up deep in its end when it was time to put the second line in, and Tressel decided against it). Generally, OSU has been liberally substituting all year with little letup. On defense in particular, I would say a good 20 players have played in each game so far. Offensively, it's fewer. But I would expect more of the same Saturday against a weaker opponent.
Has there ever been an explanation from coach Tressel or his assistants regarding why Ted Ginn has never been allowed to play both wide receiver and his old high school position, cornerback (a la Chris Gamble)? This year in particular, with so much of the secondary having departed, would have seemingly been the perfect time. Has Ted ever expressed any disappointment about that decision?
Ken: Early in camp, I recall asking several coaches and Ginn about it, and you'd have thought I had asked if they had stopped beating their wife. All I can tell you is everyone seems to think Ginn is best served by concentrating at receiver, to be the best he can be at that position. Now, there are two choices: 1. They're telling the truth or 2. They plan to use him at DB later in the year and shunned the question for the purpose of deceiving opponents. I think answer No. 1 is more likely. As for Ginn, he claims not to be disappointed, but he was the nation's high school defensive player of the year in 2003. Inside, I'm sure he'd love to do both.
I'm wondering, after watching the performances during these first five games, why Anthony Gonzalez hasn't received more Heisman hype than Ted Ginn? Gonzalez ertainly has been more dependable, more exciting and more productive. -- Bob T. in Greenwood, S.C.
Ken: Well, Gonzo is a fine player. But neither he nor Ginn are putting up Heisman numbers. It's that simple. Ginn's candidacy is fading, and unless he goes wild in the return game from here on out, he's got no chance. Look at the totals: Gonzo is on pace for a 62-catch, 970-yard, 8-TD season. That's very good, but it's not Heisman caliber. How would anyone justify giving the Heisman to anyone but Troy Smith on this team, anyway? That would be a tough argument to make.
After watching the replay of the Buckeyes' victory over Iowa, there's something disturbing I'd like you to comment on: all of the significant missed tackles by the linebackers (outside of Laurinaitus) and the secondary, plus the cutback room available to Damian Sims (which I can see Hart and others doing all day if we don't fix it.) -- K.G. in St. Paul, Minn.
Ken: No question, that has been the weak link on this defense: missed tackles and over-aggressiveness at times and being caught out of position. I noticed it a lot against Northern Illinois, and it seemed to get better until last week it popped up again. It's hard to argue with the results, because this defense makes big plays rather than all the little ones. But I'm still thinking OSU could get burned somewhere down the line by this
if it's not cleaned up. I'm right with you on this one. Could Hart be the next Biakabutuka? (I'm ducking now).
I would love to know why so-called "knowledgeable" football fans keep repeating the same bizzare statements such as "Tressel needs to open the offense a little more and quit being so conservative." -- Gregg F.
Ken: Hey, welcome to the Department of Pet Peeves. You just hit one of mine. OSU is running about 57 percent of the time. Much of that is coming in the second half, when the Buckeyes are ahead and trying to kill clock. It's working, too, because Antonio Pittman has scored the game-sealing TDs in the second half of several games already. So what's the problem? And how the heck can someone call Tressel conservative when it's third-and-2 at Iowa last week and the Buckeyes are in a shotgun, empty backfield, five-wide set? Conservative compared to what? Cirque de Soleil?
Even though the Buckeyes defense has been answering the call, as in turnovers and not giving up to many points, they have been giving up alot of yardage. Do you think giving up all those yards could lead to a problem? -- Mike S. in Tiffin
Ken: Yes, maybe. Yes, because OSU's run defense continues to be less-than-stellar. I was amazed that Texas went away from the run in the second half because it was working. I also thought Iowa was having success and all the sudden, while it's still a close game Drew Tate attempted eight straight passes. Huh??? Penn State was about the only team that really committed to the run, and it's no coincidence that's the team that gave OSU its biggest scare so far. I say "maybe" only because most of the Buckeyes' upcoming opponents will not be able to stay in games long enough to stick with the run. Michigan, though, should give OSU a healthy dose of Mike Hart if Lloyd Carr is smart.
Maybe this is for the coach and not you: Can they give Ted more opportunity to showcase himself? -- Steve H.
Ken: That's OK, I play armchair coach every day and get paid for it! They've given Ted plenty of opportunities in the passing game. Every game, they have thrown deep to him at least once, not always ending in completions. He's the main guy on punt and kick returns, so there's not much more they can do there. That leaves defense (which I addressed earlier) and rushing. He's run one reverse (for minus-6 yards). Personally, I think you'll see a few more of those later in the year. Not a ton, but a few more. And if you want to go straight to the source, Tressel's e-mail address is easy to find through OSU's Web site.
This year I notice we have two players (Doug Datish and Vernon Gholston) who wear the same uniform number (50). How can this happen?
Ken: Actually, that's one of just 26 pairs of players who share numbers: Kurt Coleman and Ray Small wear 4; Ted Ginn and Antonio Henton both wear 7; Roy Hall and Aaron Gant are 8; Brian Hartline and Robert Rose are 9; and so on. Basically, as long as two players aren't on the field at the same time with the same number, it's allowable. So most pairs include a redshirt or walk-on who aren't going to play at all, or the two guys aren't on the same special teams units. It happens because the NCAA allows you to dress 105 players, and also because schools retire numbers (such as OSU's 22, 27, 45, 47 and maybe a few others I'm forgetting who are up on the wall of the stadium).
If OSU was to run the table, what other national-championship contenders do you think they match up well against, and which ones most likely would cause problems?
Ken: If they run the table, that eliminates No. 6 Michigan, so I'll stick to the other four in the top 5. I would say the best matchups for OSU would be USC and West Virginia, mainly because I'm not sold on their defenses. Although if the Mountaineers beat Louisville, they have defeated a great offense. The teams I think OSU would have trouble with are Auburn and Florida. The Buckeyes have historically struggled against the SEC, they haven't beaten an SEC team since LSU in 1988. To get to the title game, either of those SEC teams would have survived a brutal schedule, arguably tougher than OSU's. I can't sit here and break down all the X's and O's quickly, so I'll leave it at that.
Do you think Michigan State is still the threat it was a few weeks ago, or have the Spartans begun their second-half snooze a little early this year? -- Buckeye Bob in Bexley
Ken: Well, BB, let's watch their game tomorrow at Michigan and judge them afterward. If the Spartans put up a good fight, I'd say they're still dangerous to OSU next week in East Lansing. They always seem to give the Buckeyes problems with that effective rollout, quick-pass offense, and OSU's still-young defense could be caught off guard. But if the Wolverines flatten their in-state rivals, then all the fight has gone out of Sparty and I would expect a relatively easy OSU victory next week.
How could we look like we did against Penn State (utterly uncreative offensively and playing not to lose), then turn around and surgically dismantle Iowa like we did Texas? I don't think the weather was much of a factor. What do you think?
Ken: You're not giving Penn State any credit. In my opinion, their defense matches up perfectly with OSU's offense: physical up front and speedy linebackers. Troy Smith was a bit off in the passing game, that was a factor as well. I don't think it has anything to do with play-calling. The weather was a small factor. And even if it is, "playing not to lose" as you say, I recall them playing not to lose all the way to the 2002 national title. I'm not trying to be smart here, I'm making the point that Penn State's defense was much better than Iowa's, and OSU just plain executed better last week. Sometimes, that's not worth over-analyzing.
That team from up north sure is making us nervous about our Buckeyes! Tell us something to soothe our growing fears of maize-and-blue domination. -- Otto H. and Igor H.
Ken: Otto and Igor? Is there Internet service in Transylvania? OK, OK, you have every right to be nervous. To coach Lloyd Carr's credit, he revamped his coaching staff, and the results have been superb. Mike Hart's return to health has been a huge factor, as well as the speedy Ohio kid at receiver, Mario Manningham. The Wolverines have all the tools to be in the national-title game, if they can overcome that 1-4 mark they own against Jim Tressel. There, did that last stat make you feel better?
Moderator: Let's call it a day. Great questions today, readers. And amazingly, not one about Bowling Green. Ken, thanks for another Heisman effort.
 
Upvote 0
Dispatch

Transcript of OSU football online chat with Tim May
The Columbus Dispatch
Friday, October 13, 2006 1:10 PM

Log on to Dispatch.com/buckeyes or BuckeyeXtra.com/buckeyes every Friday at noon during Ohio State's football season for a live chat with either Ken Gordon or Tim May, OSU football reporters for The Dispatch.
Below is a transcript of Tim's chat before the Buckeyes' game against Michigan State:
Do you agree that the Big Ten "sold out" fans by allowing ESPNU to have exclusive rights to some of the conference games this season (including OSU-Indiana). I know it's all about the money, but a helluva lot of people in central Ohio couldn't buy ESPNU even if they wanted to because the cable operators don't offer it. I think this stinks. -- Jimmy in Columbus
TIM: The sell-out started long ago, Jimmy, when game times started being altered from the traditional 1:30 so they could fill an early- or a late-afternoon slot as part of the television "inventory." Am I surprised that major-college football programs and conferences around the country are bowing to the will of TV networks just for the sake of exposure and splashes of cash? Are you kidding? Being able to watch Northern Illinois at Miami of Ohio on Sunday night this week was interesting, but how about all of those empty seats? I'm not sure how that helps a league's image at all. But back to your question, think about this: If you didn't have cable and thus ESPN and ESPN2, you wouldn't have been able to watch more than half of OSU's games the past few years. The point is, you've been paying to watch OSU football for a while now. As for the ESPNU thing, ESPN is just trying to get folks like you to complain to your cable operator so it WILL offer ESPNU, so you will fork over even a little more money. It's called riding herd, and the devoted fans are the cash cows. They always have been.
Will the loss of David Patterson this weekend lead to an upset? The importance of the defensive tackles is sometimes overlooked. Thanks. -- Jonathan in Shreveport, La.
TIM: Ohio State has done a great job this year rolling non-starters into the action, which is why my short answer to you is "no." Joel Penton has played extensively, as has Todd Denlinger. And there might be a new name about to emerge: Doug Worthington. The long-armed defensive end has been working a lot at defensive tackle the past few weeks in practice, and Jim Tressel expects Worthington to play Saturday.
If you disregard how Michigan State has repeatedly gagged this season and how their coach is a bit of a goofball, how do the Spartans stack up against the Buckeyes based solely on pure talent? -- Mac in Kenosha, Wis.
TIM: Three weeks ago I would have said they stack up extremely well. In fact, this was the game I pointed to in preseason missives and on gab shows as being the pothole on the OSU national championship highway. I don't feel that way anymore. Forget the MSU gag reflex, the Spartans are beat up on offense and defense. Michigan was simply superior physically last week, and the Buckeyes should be this week. Yet never discount the cornered effect on a football team. MSU might not be at its best, but it still has good talent.
I would like your thoughts on the disappearance of Mighty Mo Wells. I haven't had much opportunity to see any of the games. I haven't seen his name anywhere in the stat sheet. He sure looks like a guy who would be great on a delayed screen or the up back on a swing pass. Sizewise I know he is not your typical off-tackle runner, but he has got some moves in the open field. Given the leads OSU has had, do you think Tress is overlooking a talent here? -- Craig K.
TIM: Mighty Mo has had some rare sightings this season, but not to the extent I'm sure he would have liked. Personally, I thought you'd see him more involved at least in the passing game, and he's had a couple of flashes there. As for running, there was no way he was going to run around Antonio Pittman on the depth chart, and on top of that, the coaches were insistent on getting power back Chris Wells -- the No.1 RB prospect in the country -- into the swing as soon as possible. It's tough being the spare in a pair-and-a-spare concept.
Other than Michigan, what team do you think will give the Buckeyes the best game from now until the rest of the season? -- Tom in Hoboken, N.J.
TIM: Michigan State on Saturday, and perhaps Minnesota in two weeks. That's because when things are clicking for their respective offenses, they are a danger to any team they face. Now, if either one of those could just play a little defense when it matters ...
I am really concerned about the trip to East Lansing this weekend. I remember 1974 and 1997 only too well. Although Coach Tressel and his staff are about the best in college football at getting players ready for a big game, they still are dealing with 19- and 20-year-old kids. What is your gut feeling on the readiness of our "kids" to deal with Michigan State? -- George in Louisiana
TIM: First of all, you meant 1998, but in your angst you mis-typed. I know. Happens to me all the time. In regards to your question, for starters, this OSU team is loaded with 16 fifth-year seniors, eight of whom start. Those fellows aren't kids, believe me. And my gut feeling is that the Buckeyes have been pointing to this game just like they were pointing to road trips to Texas and Iowa. They know MSU had them on the ropes in Ohio State last year before the Ashton Youboty blocked field-goal return for a TD changed the game. And they know MSU came back on them in East Lansing two years ago before Ted Ginn Jr. broke their back with the slant he took for a touchdown. But my gut has been wrong before, especially after a night of Mexican food and frivolity.
You've been on the OSU beat a long time. Can you remember the last time a game wasn't available to all of the local viewing audience? -- Arthur in Gahanna
TIM: Yes, there were a couple in 1997, and as I pointed out to a previous questioner, it depends on what you call a "local viewing audience." If you're one of the few folks left in the world who doesn't have either cable or a dish, you've been out of luck every time the game has been on ESPN or ESPN2. As for me, I can remember watching college football games on TV before there was instant replay, and when teams were limited to so many regional and national TV appearances per year so as to spread the exposure. That's why it was great to have a radio, and great to have that Sunday paper, chock full of photos and stories about the game. So buy a Dispatch on Sunday and read all about it. Believe me, it's a lot cheaper than buying a dish satellite system.
I'm seriously concerned about our tackling ability. We had gotten better in Game 3, but we are beginning to lapse again. We are doing great overall (not allowing them to score), but I doubt that type of tackling will work against Michigan. Do you think Tressel will have them in shape and ready for the matchup in November? -- Leslie S. in Austin, Texas
TIM: The tackling has gotten better by the game, in my opinion. An isolated miss here or there can ruin the day, I know. Where the team has worked to improve is making sure it is "gap sound" from play to play. When one person is out of position as a play develops, it can make everybody look bad. Seeing Larry Grant out there in place of Marcus Freeman at strong side linebacker on running downs last week was interesting, and it means the coaches are still playing with the pieces, trying to get the best fit.
I've heard so many people -- mainly the radio and TV talking heads -- bring up Michigan State's upset of No. 1 OSU in 1998. My question is why? It was EIGHT years ago! How does that in any way effect tomorrow's game? Please enlighten me. Is it that hard to come up with an original angle? (BTW, I'm not lumping you in here.) -- Marc L. in Ostrander
TIM: Well, since I'm writing about that and the '74 game for Saturday's paper, lump me in all you want. It's germane only because the similarities leading up to the games. In both cases OSU was undefeated and No.1, while MSU was a .500 club just looking for something good to jump-start the season. The main reason it matters is because this MSU team is potent when it plays well, and because, well, history has a way of repeating itself. Personally, though, I'm like you. I don't think even what happened a year ago has much impact on a college game, because the teams are so different from year to year.
What do you think the Bucks need to do to do a better job defensively to stop the run? -- Mike S. in Tiffin
TIM: I touched on that earlier, but let me say this: In six games, they have had two backs rip on them for more than 100 yards, Northern Illinois' Garrett Wolfe, now considered to be in the top three in the Heisman Trophy race, and Penn State's Tony Hunt. This defense is not stopping the run like last year, granted, but it's also not giving up gobs of yards.
Is Todd Boeckman able to play again? Since Rob Schoenhoft was the third QB Saturday, has he moved ahead of Boeckman, or was it just the injury status? Also, how is the freshman QB coming along? -- Jim in Clarksville, Tenn.
TIM: We understand Boeckman is good to go, which means he's probably No.3, behind Justin Zwick. Freshman Antonio Henton is being red-shirted, but he has drawn praise for his efforts on the scout team, and most insiders expect him to make a strong challenge for playing time in the spring. Sometimes he looks almost like a clone of Troy Smith. It's weird.
All season it seems like the defense is vulnerable to outside screens and swing passes out of the backfield. Are our cornerbacks slow in coming upfield or are the linebackers stacked inside a little too tight?
TIM: I don't agree with your blanket statement, especially in regards to swing passes. They did a good job against that in the win at Iowa, and the Hawkeyes loved that play going in. Funny, but Ken Gordon and I were just talking the other day about how we felt OSU cornerbaacks Malcolm Jenkins and Antonio Smith were doing a good job coming up strong on sweeps, swings, screens and things. The same goes for safety Brandon Mitchell. Occasionally, though, you're going to get blocked. As former OSU coach John Cooper likes to say, "The other team practices too."
How much time are you granted to talk to players and watch practices? And how does this differ from either Coach Cooper or Coach Bruce? -- Ted in Columbus
TIM: We get about 30 minutes on Tuesday with two or more selected players right after the Jim Tressel press luncheon. Then we get about 30 minutes with four selected players after Tuesday's practice. If you really need, say, one player for a special story you're doing, he's often provided. We do not get to watch any practice any more, not even stretching periods (that's an inside joke, and I am laughing right now). As for how that compares to Cooper and Bruce, Cooper was extremely open with his policy his first years before he started to clamp down as the media horde grew larger. It varied from year to year, really, from very open to very controlled. With Bruce, the whole practice was open almost every day with the exception of Michigan week and usually one other week before another "big game." And access to players generally was excellent. Actually, Bruce had a pretty funny line: "Nobody ever wants to come to practice until I close it." He was pretty much right, but I was there every day.
Assuming both teams win out, do you think Florida could overtake OSU for the #1 spot? Not that it matters much, but still. -- Kraig J. in Seattle
TIM: If both teams win out, I do not see Florida overtaking Ohio State, simply because OSU has such a huge lead in the No. 1 votes and the points at the moment. But if the Buckeyes start scraping along, anything can happen. Remember Penn State in 1994? That was as formidable a team as the Big Ten has seen, but when the Nittany Lions cruised through a win at Indiana, they dropped from No. 1 to No. 2. I never thought I would see a Big Ten team go undefeated and not win the national championship. Of course, that also was pre-BCS days, so the Nittany Lions didn't get a chance to right the wrong in a title game.
If the Buckeyes run the table and Troy wins the Heisman, would you rank him as the greatest QB in OSU history? I think you've seen them all, right?
TIM: I think I've seen all of the ones who would be considered, yes, at least (in Rex Kern's case) on television. In preseason I said Troy had a tremenous chance to be the GOAT -- Greatest Of All Time -- if he continued to improve and win. Well, he has done both. You know his resume, and he now has the best career passing-efficiency rating in the history of the Big Ten. Not bad for an "athlete."
The Buckeye defense has been a big surprise this season, in my opinion. However, the total yardage they surrender per game gives me concern. Although they seem to be the bend-but-don't-break variety, do you think they can continue to give up that many yards and beat a team like the one up north? (Please, no flashbacks to Biakabatuka). -- Ron in Richmond, Va.
TIM: That's an open-ended query. The short answer is, yes, they can give up 300.67 yards (that's their current average) to Michigan and still win. That is, if the OSU ffense continues at its pace (386.67). I always tell people there are only three stats that really matter in a football game: how many points you score, how many points the opponent scores and turnovers, because the third usually has a direct effect on the first two. This OSU defense is No.1 in the country in fewest points allowed (9.3 average) and No.3 in turnover margin, gaining 1.67 more per game than the opponent. At the moment you'd have to say the Buckeyes are two out of three on the relevant stat scale. That's pretty darn good.
MODERATOR: Looks like our time with Tim is up. Thanks for the questions, readers. And one note: Next week's chat will be on Dispatch.com.U. Contact your local Internet service provider to subscribe.
 
Upvote 0
Dispatch

Transcript of OSU football online chat with Ken Gordon
The Columbus Dispatch
Friday, October 20, 2006 1:01 PM

Log on to Dispatch.com/buckeyes or BuckeyeXtra.com/buckeyes every Friday at noon during Ohio State's football season for a live chat with either Ken Gordon or Tim May, OSU football reporters for The Dispatch.
Below is a transcript of Ken's chat before the Buckeyes' game against Indiana:
Moderator's note: We'd like to answer two questions that repeatedly are submitted in hopes of stemming the tide. First: Ohio State and Michigan never have met as the No. 1 and No. 2 teams in the country. Second: Since OSU-Michigan became the final game on the teams' schedules, only twice have they met when both were undefeated. OSU won 20-9 in 1970. The matchup in 1973 ended in a 10-10 tie.
Do Buckeye fans in central Ohio have a right to be as mad as they are about OSU-Indiana being offered only on ESPNU (and a replay eight hours after the fact doesn't count)? Any idea if fans in other Big Ten cities get to watch all of their teams' games locally? -- Brian in Columbus
KEN: Well, personally I believe "rights" don't extend much farther than the Bill of Rights, but I understand your question. Fans have come to expect every game will be on TV. But here's the rub: Do all games have to be on free TV to qualify? Did you complain 15 or so years ago when some games were shifted to ESPN, which you have to purchase cable to see? I know, cable is now viewed as a mandatory thing for sports fans, but believe it or not, not everyone has it. So now, ESPN is just trying to take it to the next level, ESPNU, and since it's not widely available, people are upset. Maybe 15 years from now, everyone has ESPNU and it's not a big deal. I'm not sure how it works in other Big Ten markets, to be honest, but I'll bet you wouldn't get the same outcry from Northwestern fans as you do in Columbus!
What do you think about the SOS (strength of schedule) that the computers use in the BCS formula? Ohio State has not played an easy schedule by any means, with night-away games at Texas and Iowa, but the formula seems slanted toward Pac-10 and SEC schools. -- Andy in Melbourne, Fla.
KEN: If you have the first clue as to what that formula is, you're ahead of me. It seems that year in and year out, Big Ten and SEC teams are rewarded the most for their schedules. The SEC is brutal, particularly the East division, so I have no problem with that. But this formula, do the computers care that OSU won at night? Do they factor in the atmosphere, tipsy fans, etc? How can they accurately reflect how tough a game really is? That's some formula.
How is Indiana's run defense this year compared to the past? Will JT work on perfecting the ground game or continue to air it out? When was the last time OSU had more than one back run for 100+ yards in the same game? Keep up the good work. -- Ben in New Albany
KEN: Indiana's run defense is the same as usual: lousy. Last in the Big Ten. This has always been a get-healthy game for OSU's rushing totals -- and expect more of the same Saturday. The last time OSU had two 100-yard rushers was last year vs. Iowa: Antonio Pittman (171) and Troy Smith (127). I don't think Tressel has been airing it out, per se. The Buckeyes are averaging 36 rushes and 27 pass attempts a game.
What's the status of Todd Boeckman? -- Jamie in St. Louis
KEN: Coaches said this week is the first week they consider Boeckman healthy enough to play since he sprained an ankle on Sept. 16. Keep in mind, though, he is the third-string QB, and Justin Zwick will go in first if something happens to Smith or OSU gets a big lead. This staff has been consistent in saying they do not look ahead to 2007 when substituting QBs. They have to worry about this season first, and how does it make Zwick feel if Boeckman goes in before him Saturday? They might need Zwick before the season is out, you don't want him pouting. By the way, I mistakenly called Boeckman "Tim" in print the other day ... of course, his father's name is Tim, and OSU's cornerbacks coach is Tim Beckman, so maybe I can cut myself some slack?
Is it me, or does our defense seem to be prone to over-pursue on a fair amount of plays? To me, it looks like the guys might be setting themselves up for a rough way to go against teams that are more likely to use your tendencies against you. -- Kara in Chapel Hill, N.C.
KEN: It's not you, I think you're right. The Buckeyes are young and aggressive, and at times have been caught because of it. Early on, I kept predicting eventual disaster for OSU if it couldn't improve against the run, but as time goes on and this defense is giving up nine points a game, I just throw my hands up and quit trying to analyze it too much. But I belong to Analyzers Anonymous, which means I can't quit. ... I can still envision a game against an opponent with a really good cutback runner (Mike Hart?) carving up the Buckeyes. Hasn't happened yet, maybe it never will.
Do you think that Florida International and Miami, along with their conferences (ACC-Sun Belt), went far enough in the penalties in the aftermath of that travesty on the PAT? -- G.B. in Cleveland
KEN: My biggest problem is that everyone waited until "the aftermath" as you put it, to act. Officials waited until the public outcry grew to a point they couldn't ignore, rather than do the right thing last Saturday as it happened. In my opinion, no way should that game have continued after the brawl. The game should have been a forfeit for both teams, and they should have immediately announced next year's Miami-Fla. International game was cancelled (yes, they are scheduled to play again). I think the suspensions were probably fair and sufficient, but not enough was done earlier in the fiasco.
Why did none of OSU's kickoffs to Michigan State reach the end zone? Were they purposely kicking it short as some sort of strategy? I thought at first that they were kicking into the wind, but then it also happened when they were kicking the opposite way. -- John in Westerville
KEN: First, the company line: The wind apparently was weird last week; Tressel once said it seemed to be against them both ways. Now, my line: For some reason, OSU went away from using Aaron Pettrey on kickoffs. Pettrey had booted 19 of his first 27 kickoffs this year for touchbacks, but after his first kickoff two weeks ago against Bowling Green went to the goal line, Tressel went with Ryan Pretorius instead. Since then, only two of Pretorius' 12 kickoffs have been touchbacks. If it's me, I'd put Pettrey back in, no-brainer.
Do you think there will be a year when the Big Ten will open up the schedule so that all teams in the conference will play each other? -- Mike S. in Tiffin
KEN: No way, Jose -- er, Mike. No way, and here's why: That would make 10 league games and only two non-league games. These days, big-money schools like OSU need seven or eight home games a year. With 10 league games, five of those would be on the road. That would force teams to schedule two non-league home games rather than a good home-and-home series like OSU has with Texas, USC, Miami and so forth. Really, though, it has less to do with wanting easier schedules and more to do with the finances necessary to support a $90 million athletic budget.
A few weeks ago during the OSU game in the stadium, the officials called a timeout and had a player leave the field to change his jersey because there was too much blood on it. How is that timeout classified? I've never heard of such a timeout before in the almost 40 years I have been in attendance at the games.
KEN: That was linebacker Paul Posluszny of Penn State, who apparently sliced up his arm somehow, maybe on a facemask or chin strap? I can't find it in my play-by-play at first glance, but my recollection is the timeout was not charged to Penn State. Officials call time for equipment problems, etc., at their discretion. Funny aside: A few years ago when I covered the Bengals, RB Corey Dillon cut his arm in a game at Indianapolis, and blood apparently was flowing pretty freely. It was late October, and for Halloween, a lot of Cincinnati kids went as Dillon, with fake blood spouting from their arms.
Under Jim Heacock, the OSU defense seems less aggressive in posture than it was under Mark Dantonio. They even seem less inclined to blitz than they were last year. I won't argue with what's working -- nobody scores on them much. But do you agree with me, and if so, is this a difference in coaching philosophy since Dantonio's day, or an adjustment to a younger secondary?
KEN: I disagree that Heacock is less aggressive than Dantonio. Think back to last year, Heacock's first as coordinator. OSU blitzed relentlessly, much more than they did under Mark Snyder in 2004. Now this year, you are correct, so far they have blitzed a bit less. But that's because the Buckeyes have been able to get pressure with their front four defensive linemen. If you can do that, it allows you to not gamble so much with blitzes and drop guys into coverage, where they have 13 interceptions so far. What I'm saying is like all good coaches, Heacock adjusts his play-calling to suit his personnel. That's the essence of good coaching, rather than force a particular style onto your players, whether they can handle it or not.
Which of the Wells boys look best so far?
KEN: In uniform, or out? On the field, Chris "Beanie" Wells wins that contest. He's a truck in pads, an Earl Campbell-type who relishes running people over. Maurice Wells is being misused as a between-the-tackles guy. He looks like a classic NFL third-down back, use him on draws and screens. Off the field, man, you should see Maurice's head of hair. He's got a tangle of dreadlocks like I've never seen.
I try to look at the Heisman race objectively but feel I can't. So I'll ask you: Is there any way that Troy isn't about to lap the field? Peterson's out. Wolfe rushed for less than 20 yards last week. And Troy's numbers are comparable to Quinn's, and that's with Troy throwing 10-15 less passes a game. Honestly, how can this even be a "race" right now? -- Mike in Powell
KEN: Right now doesn't really matter, honestly. If OSU loses to Michigan and Notre Dame beats USC on Nov. 25, Brady Quinn (of Dublin) very well could win it. Or if Troy and Quinn both stumble and West Virginia keeps tearing it up, what about Steve Slaton? Of course, Smith is the favorite, he has been since Notre Dame lost to Michigan. But there's a reason they wait until Dec. 9 to hand it out. But how cool is it, probably having two of the three finalists be local guys?
Do you think OSU's offensive line can neutralize Michigan's front seven? Do you think that OSU will have plans for Troy Smith to run more to keep the Michigan defense honest? I envision a lot of pressure up front, with Troy rolling out and either running for yardage or throwing short-yardage passes and letting the speed demons of Ginn and Gonzo take it from there. -- Buckeye fan in Richmond, Va.
KEN: Man, we've got a few games between now and then, but I suppose Michigan questions are inevitable. I can answer one of your two questions. Yes, I think we will see Troy unleashed for the first time that day. I don't think the coaches or Troy have deemed it necessary for him to really run like he can to this point, but a mobile QB is definitely the X-factor that defenses have the most trouble with, so look for him to run around at will. Now, as for whether OSU's offensive line can neutralize Michigan's front seven, who knows? That's one of the reasons we all tune in or show up to watch these games, for classic matchups like that.
I remember reading a comment by you that if you weren't getting paid to cover the OSU-Cincinnati game, you wouldn't have gone. I agreed with you then and am wondering if you feel the same way about the next four games before _ichigan? I know I do. -- Bob in Baton Rouge, La.
KEN: I was a bit over the top that day! And really, to be honest, before I covered OSU I only attended a few games in my life, anyway. Unless you are a season-ticket holder, most of us don't go to many games. You know, the one reason I really look forward to these next four weeks is Troy Smith. Every week, he gives us something remarkable to watch. It definitely is worth the three-hour commitment to see what he'll come up with next time. I'm serious about that. Sometimes, I get jaded covering so many games in so many different sports year in and year out. But it truly is a pleasure watching a special athlete like Smith have the kind of year he's having. I felt the same way about A.J. Hawk last year, by the way.
Do Tressel and/or the coaches talk about a concern keeping this team focused the next 3-4 weeks? How can players NOT be looking ahead to Michigan? -- George in Oakton, Va.
KEN: Sure, they look ahead to Michigan. Players said this week they're college football fans, they're well aware of the Wolverines moving up to No. 2 in the Associated Press poll, and they are looking forward to what would be a huge game. It's unrealistic for a coach to expect 18- to 22-year-olds not to think about Michigan at all. But that said, this team has been pretty well focused for every game this season except for Cincinnati, and they won that game 37-7, anyway. It helps that their talent is so clearly superior to their opponents that they can make a mistake or two or have a slow start offensively and still end up with a 20-point victory. Enjoy it, years like this don't come around often.
MODERATOR: Ken, thanks for your time and insight. And remember this tomorrow: In addition to no cheering in the pressbox, falling asleep is frowned upon also.
 
Upvote 0
Second: Since OSU-Michigan became the final game on the teams' schedules, only twice have they met when both were undefeated. OSU won 20-9 in 1970. The matchup in 1973 ended in a 10-10 tie.

In 1975, tOSU was 10-0, and TSUN had no losses and 2 ties. That's undefeated.

This is a recording.

Wolfe rushed for less than 20 yards last week.

New math. 25 is now less than 20. :wink2:
 
Upvote 0
Transcript of OSU football online chat with Tim May
The Columbus Dispatch
Friday, October 27, 2006 1:14 PM
Log on to Dispatch.com/buckeyes or BuckeyeXtra.com/buckeyes every Friday at noon during Ohio State's football season for a live chat with either Ken Gordon or Tim May, OSU football reporters for The Dispatch.

Below is a transcript of Tim's chat before the Buckeyes' game against Minnesota:

Why doesn't Tressel use his fullbacks and tight ends more? It would definitely make the already muti-dimensional Buckeyes even more of a threat, and teams won't be expecting it because he never has used them to their full potential.

TIM: I don't know what to say. Then again, yes I do. Tight ends caught three touchdown passes last week (Rory Nicol two, Jake Ballard one). So that covers the tight end side. As for the fullbacks, it's rare they're even on the field more than about 15 or 20 plays in the modern OSU offense. Does that make them a secret threat for a sneaky carry? Yes. But as Nicol said last week when I asked him whether he'd like to see more passes come his way, he first said yes, of course. Then he added he understands why they don't, because the Buckeyes have bonafide big-play threats in Ted Ginn Jr., Anthony Gonzalez and Brian Robiskie at wide receiver. At least now, though, defenses also know they better keep an eye on the tight ends, too.

I know you have been covering the Buckeyes for many years, and you're very close to the pulse of the program. The current group seems to have tremendous talent, but perhaps most impressive is their poise and confidence. Have you ever seen a group that is as talented, business like and and team oriented in their approach at this current group at Ohio State? What past Buckeye team would you say they are most similar to?

TIM:
Believe it or not, I'd compare them to the 2003 team. Because despite all of the stuff that was going on around that team, not the least of which was the Maurice Clarett affair, it was a cool group led by Craig Krenzel, Will Smith, et al. What gets me about this year's team is the relative calm of all concerned. I don't think it's much of a jump to say they reflect the demeanor of their head coach.

Do you have any concern that the Buckeyes will get swept up in all the good things written about them and lose their intensity that got them this far? -- Jim in Cincinnati

TIM:
No. If it was going to happen, it would have happened by now. Quarterback Troy Smith is no hermit. He knows he's leading the Heisman race. But he sets the tone for everyone else by taking his "one play at a time" approach into every practice and game. And the youngish defense, it's still playing like it has to prove itself to everybody. No, the intra-dynamic on this team seems very strong at the moment.

There seems to be a consensus in Buckeye circles that Ted Ginn won't be back for his senior year. Furthermore, Anthony Gonzalez keeps showing up on Mel Kiper's draft board. What is the actual danger of Gonzalez leaving, and are there any other juniors who may be looking to take the leap? -- Nate B.

TIM:
If Gonzalez is projected as a first-round draft pick, he'd be foolish not to leave. If he's not, I fully expect him to stay, and I think he is planning to stay, too. As for Ginn, the consensus feeling among the media was that three years probably would be his college limit. But you never know about these things. What I do know is both should be able to make a living for a while in the NFL. That's because above all else, both have that coveted tangible property -- speed.

Do you think coach Tressel will let Troy Smith do his weekly highlight reel routine against one of the worst statistical pass defenses a little longer than he normally does -- for Heisman emphasis (I sense they have developed a deep admiration for each other, and I think coach wants badly for Troy to win) -- balanced against the fact he doesn't want to run it up on his friend Glen Mason? -- Dave in Circleville

TIM:
Funny, but my middle kid, Cory, and I were watching the end of Bethune-Cookman's romp over North Carolina A&T last night while we were waiting for the game featuring my old high school -- Lufkin, Texas -- to resume after a lightning delay. Cory remarked he didn't think Jim Tressel got enough credit for being an honorable guy. When I asked why, he said, "Because you never see him running up the score just to embarrass somebody." Hey, you never know who's paying attention, right? As for Smith and letting it rip, though, Tressel covets touchdowns -- the easier the better -- as much as any coach.

Do you have any idea if there is a set rules used to determine which players get Buckeye leaves? Or is that left solely to the discretion of the coaches? -- Will in New Albany

TIM:
Players gain buckeye leaves for all kinds of reasons, not the least of which is the team winning the game. From the defense reaching its goals, to an outstanding individual play, to the offense reaching its goals, to being graded with a winning individual performance, those sticky leaves pile up higher the better the season is going.

Assuming we get past UM, who do you see as the most troublesome matchup for the Buckeyes in a national championship game? -- Brian in Reynoldsburg

TIM:
By UM, are you referring to the University of Minnesota? I didn't think so. But say the Buckeyes get past UM, UI, NU and UM (II), the team that could be the more dangerous by season's end is USC. It is loaded with young blue-chippers. But the Trojans must survive a stretch run that features UO, UC-Berkeley, ND and UCLA. So assume nothing.

When do you think the Big Ten will ever get that 12th team so there can be two divisions and a Big Ten playoff game? What school would be a contender to possibly join the conference?

TIM:
First, conference officials -- as in the university presidents -- have shown absolutely no interest in having a league championship game. So in answer to the last part of your first question -- geez, man, quit holding your breath. You're turning blue and gold. And of course, that's hint about the answer to the first part. The Big Ten courted and then proposed to Notre Dame back in the 1990s, and then was rejected out of hand when the Fighting Irish alumni opted to maintain what they see as their elite "last of the great independents" status. So now, I really don't see a school other than Notre Dame that fits in the mental picture the Big Ten has of itself.

Will the broken toe have any long-term effects on the efficiency of Ted Ginn Jr. late in the season? With no bye week there's very little time to heal any injuries. -- Jonathan in Shreveport, La.

TIM:
All I can say is it sure didn't seem to bother him last week, and he had suffered four days before before. Now he has had another week in between to take it easy. I asked Jim Tressel if it was a "big gulp" moment when the coaches learned about it, and he said no. So, there you go.

Why do you think that the pro scouts think that Brady Quinn will be a better pro QB and be drafted ahead of Troy Smith? Troy has a great arm, can make all the throws all over the field, he's a great leader and is excellent at reading defenses due to watching a tremendous amount of film. Plus he's more mobile. -- Tim R.

TIM:
Are you a pro scout just digging me for information? In a nutshell, one thing Quinn has that Troy doesn't is about three more inches in height, to about 6-4. I'm not sure all scouts agree on your premise, but in covering football for about 34 years now, I've found that the NFL isn't a lot different than any other profession -- there is a lot of pack mentality involved. "Hey, he's playing for Charlie Weis, so Quinn's got to be good." You know the routine. Personally, I think they're both very good, but I think Troy Smith's escapability sets him apart. Because now he doesn't scramble to run, he scrambles to get a second or third shot at tossing the rock.

How valuable are the instant replays to coach Jim Tressel?

TIM:
They must be really valuable, because he keeps them in a safe instead of using them. He has yet to ask for a replay review of a questionable call. His theory is, the Big Ten already has an official doing that up in the press box who has a much better view of things than he does.

Based on your conversations with assistant coaches, who do you think is the top true freshman performer on the team this year? -- Johnny D. in Westerville

TIM:
Oh, Chris "Beanie" Wells, because he's the only one really doing much at this point. He is the team's short-yardage back of choice, has stepped up dramatically in his ability as a pass-protector and with the exception of that fumble at Michigan State has been accountable. But there are some fellows I really like for the future, including DB Kurt Coleman, defensive end Robert Rose and flanker Ray Small. So stay tuned.

Which conferences other than the Big Ten have you been impressed and disappointed with? -- G.B. in Cleveland

TIM:
It might surprise you, but I think the Big East is way underrated. I was saying that a year ago, too, and then when West Virginia sprinted into the Sugar Bowl and shocked Georgia, others picked up the scent. The problem with the Big East, and it's a legitimate complaint, is hardly anyone played a decent out-of-league schedule this year. Louisville tried in taking on Miami, but my goodness, the brawling 'Canes could barely hold off Duke last week. I still think the Big East champ -- West Virginia, Louisville or Rutgers -- is going to be a tough team come bowl time again. And the upcoming game on Thursday night between Louisville and West Virginia is must-see TV.

I get the feeling that you really enjoy covering games and like college football (unlike a certain Dispatch columnist). I'm curious: What's the best game you've ever seen in person (whether OSU was involved or not)? -- James in Fort Knox, Ky.

TIM:
You'll think I'm kidding, but Lufkin vs. John Tyler in Texas in 1974 was a tremendous high school game, and there were five Southwest Conference head coaches in the Lufkin press box that night. But you're right, I've seen a ton of them. I was standing about 40 feet away from Minnesota's Ahmad Rashad when he made that catch to beat the Browns; Ohio State's two great comebacks, from 24-0 down against Illinois in 1984 and 31-0 down at Minnesota in 1989 were unbelieveable. And there was OSU's Joe Germaine-led march in the Rose Bowl, and, of course, the two-overtime win by OSU in the Fiesta Bowl national title game. And don't discount JoePa and Penn State's rally from I think it was 19 down to beat Ohio State in 2001. That temporarily made Paterno the winningest major college coach in history. Man, I wish you hadn't asked that question because I'm leaving out about 50, like last year's Texas-OSU game.

Since Nate B. brought up the possibility of No. 7 and/or No. 11 jumping to the NFL next year, who do you think will be a better pro -- schemes and systems aside? My bet is Gonzo. -- Dave in Roundtown

TIM:
Dave, I'm not just being cute here, I think they both could be good. I don't think Ginn gets enough credit for his tremendous progress as a receiver in three years. He doesn't just use his speed any more to get open, and he catches almost everything. And he's got a knack for making people miss without all the fancy steps of, say, a Barry Sanders. As for Gonzalez, he is on the field like he is off of it -- he's smart, curious, and likes to win with both his brain and his feet. He also could be a know-it-all, but that's probably the coolest thing about him. He's not. He is as interesting a conversationalist as has put on the scarlet and gray.

Assuming both teams win out, the Michigan game this year is shaping up to be the biggest regular-season game in a very long time, maybe the biggest ever. Are we better off to treat it like Texas, where rotating so many players into the game early seemed to ease the nerves of the team, or should we play our best from start to finish? -- John P.

TIM:
All of the above. What makes this Ohio State team special, in my opinion, is the amount of players who have made substantial contributions. From the second-team offensive line paving the way to the first touchdown in the win at Texas, to the eight-man rotation on the defensive line, to the newly minted role for backup outside linebacker Curtis Terry in the dime coverage scheme -- it's been interesting to watch. As Jim Tressel says, every team is different from year to year, and it's the morale brought on by the depth of this team that makes it stand out from the rest.

Moderator: Tim, great job today. So great that you might want to get your tuxedo cleaned for a trip to New York in December. That's all we have time for. Thanks also to the readers for the questions.

http://www.columbusdispatch.com/football/football.php?story=222475
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top