JoJaBuckeye;774922; said:Spin this: indictment = impeachment
While I'll give you that an indictment and an impeachment are parallels in many respects, they are not "equal"
Clinton was impeached. Fact. Deal therewith.
1 - never voted for Clinton (just wanted you to know that)
2 - Let me ask you this, in line with the impeach bush thread.. suppose Bush got impeached by the dems for being an idiot (something, btw, that I disagree with doing) would you "deal therewith"
If you think I am spinning, then set my position straight for me and for the forum. If you cannot demonstrate that I have misstated the facts, then you should stop misrepresenting my posts with buzz words.
Facts? Son, I've taken issue with your opinions (which, of course, you believe constitute facts). Actually, it wasn't even an opinion which I took issue with originally, it was your comment that ekeen's blame the victim post was "priceless" Next, I'd simply remark that the tone of your posts (highly arrogant) and the positions you've taken on other threads is additional support for why I'm calling you a spinner. It is my opinion (and not a fact) that you don't have much to offer these threads but lame attempts to escalate bullshit bickering and the like. You're, in my mind, a poor man's Rush Limbaugh or Bill O'Rielly. Or Al Franken, if you like. Does that put too fine of a point on it for you?
I didn't hear James Carville raising any substantive apologia for Clinton, either. The best he could do was: "Drag a hundred-dollar bill through a trailer park, you never know what you'll find."
Don't change the subject. I know you spinners always go back to Clinton when your back is against the wall and all, but this isn't about Clinton. Obviously you are either incapable or unwilling to follow the point I was illustrating by my example of how Republicans treated Clinton's impeachment.
Exactly the kind of bullshit hyperbole I'm using the word "spin" as including. You're not even that good at it. And... it's all you've got. (Actually, truth is, I can tell from your posts that you could offer this forum something of interest or value, but you're unwilling or unable to back off your love affair with Sean Hannity induced garbage.)We took that to mean that Clinton was in the habit of dragging Bennies through Arkansas trailer parks. Because that is what it does mean, and someone looking like Paula Jones is about what I'd expect Clinton to derive from the effort.
JoJa, since you apparently don't get subtlety.. I'm riding your ass the last couple of days not because I'm interested in arguing substance with you. I'm riding your ass because I would LIKE to be interested in arguing substance with you, but your posts, posting style etc. make it impossible for me to take you seriously. I may be alone in this opinion of you, but as a member of this board (and I don't mean mod) I am stating my opinion that your inclusion here, as it has been in the past, has been detrimental. Since you don't take to hints, I'm saying get your shit together, and leave the rhetoric at the door. I can turn on CNN, FOX, etc. for that. I come here to discuss stuff at a higher level, and your posts are not conducive for that.
Get it?
I probably shoulda taken care of this via PM, but frankly, considering the thread I started about the state of the Poliboard I'm using you as an example. I suppose that's "uncool" of me. So be it. I accept the consequences of my actions in this regard.
Last edited: