Search results

We really should get him some real minutes early next season.

Agreed, completely.

There's definitely a way to lose it, P34, but it would be not taking them seriously and slack-assing the game. I agree with you and I just don't see that happening.

It's crazy that he has eligibility left. He looks like he's been working in a factory for twenty-five years to put three kids through college. Got what we in the south call that old man strong. :)

Yes, he excels at it, but he also sucks at it. It just depends on which Day we get and from much of what I’ve seen this year, I’m not super encouraged. Hartline didn’t call that bullshit Indiana scheme by himself. Let’s hope that we somehow get the CFP 2024 version.

I’m inclined to agree even in a year where we’ve been too TE-focused.

And he/they did it in a relatively short time with one guy moving over from safety and the other going from our third LB last year to AA as a first time starter. That’s development.

Innis isn't going anywhere, innit?

Since it’s roughly Xmas-time, my grandmother would say, “Y’all listen here, that boy’s about to throw them moneychangers out the temple, you hear?”

I’ve had a chance to breathe now, and scum imploding has been a nice bonus. I’d like to see these clowns again in the CFP final. I think they played their best and we played if not our worst, close to it and lost by three. I don’t see us taking them lightly and that happening again.

I feel ok about Hartline in the first game with three weeks to work with, but he has to be locked in for the second two games.

Yes, because it can be an efficient and explosive offense. I'll take eight chances rather than four with this offense. In between, I'm playing the odds that this defense will minimize the potential damage of our extra possessions. That's what we did last year in the playoff. I think our...

I understand and agree to disagree. We're not good enough to only have a few bites at the apple and our defense is good enough to minimize what the other side can do. I think that given enough bites at it we will execute. We are that good on offense. I simply, at this point trust the defense...

You can also have more time of possession by having more possessions. That's what's a little maddening to me. If we had a slightly above average defense, ok, I can see trying to extend the time of each drive. We don't have that. We have one of the, if not the, best defenses we've had. I...

Defender closed pretty quickly and my thought was that Sayin was a little gun shy about interceptions. I didn't have a problem with him not throwing to Jackson, but I question why he didn't just run for the yard. He had two there, easy.

I think the IU game showed that he's not a finished product as an OC. Maybe he'll be a CEO-type of HC.

He doesn’t get a pass because we’ve had other mediocre and worse kickers and we don’t get a pass for having had so many mediocre and worse kickers. There’s this thing called to transfer portal now and we seem to use it magnificently for most other positions. Go out and get a fucking kicker...

Contrast our running plays with that kid Black for IU. I’m not sure I’ve ever seen a back hit the hole as fast as a few of his runs.

I think right now Tate would be my first option. Absolutely agree about IU. We shouldn’t have let them, but they stepped up and won it.

Yes, I don’t disagree with any of this and I still think that when matched up against a better than usual opponent, that is the time to overwhelm and end them early. What’s the point of having better talent if you don’t use it when you need it. Playing the same efficiency game as always lowers...