Search results

No one is saying the Cavs are the perfect team, but to use a loss while on a west coast road trip over Christmas as evidence they’re “absolutely awful” is being pedantic. Anyone doubting they’re still the favorites in the east along with the Celtics is kidding themselves.

Remember these? These were from the Raptors series in 2016, you know, the series they won emphatically before they went on to win the championship over GS. Hyperbole is your schtick when it comes to the Cavs.

:panic: Where were you in this thread during their win streak? Oh that’s right, crickets.

Won the ship by 0.5!

Winston has the higher ceiling but also the lower floor. Carr has been steady but not spectacular either way. I’ve played both at times this year. I’d go w Carr since you don’t need major points from him.

Any D playing Cleveland is a good pick

Yep, still made the finals though. And I get zeke back this week!

Or Baldwin. 0.6 points!

Pick my flex: Mike Davis Mike Evans Doug Baldwin

Tough to trust Foles without seeing him in action yet this year, leaning Goff

Not sure I’d make that trade. Brees hasn’t been up to his usual standard with the Saints turning into more of a running team and I’d honestly trust Hopkins in a tougher matchup than hope Cooper suddenly fixes his season long funk

The Library Short North Tavern

Mama’s Pasta & Brew

I'm sure this is something she's worked on before, but I would take a closer look at her throwing mechanics. Using her lower body, core, and upper quarter rotation instead of all arm. Anything at that distance or above is going to take more power generation and likely too much strain through the...

I've used Private Internet Access before with good results, especially with using a gift card as payment and throw away email if you really want to be anonymous with little trail back to you. I'm using proXPN now, for a one-time fee with a lifetime subscription. Both work great, proXPN works...

Of course the coaching staff isn't going to mention their agreement. It likely isn't officially part of their contract, just a "handshake" deal. Assistants come to OSU for the chance to be HCs, they're not going to broadcast they are staying in case they interview after year 1, like Schiano...

Read my previous post where I said both teams are close to equal, with Clemson having the slight advantage, especially on offense. I also added that game flow can affect the final score along with talent level. I'm not surprised one bit. Try to stay with me. I'm not interested in rating...

That all is fine. You can have on-paper estimations of players, I'll stick with real-life observations of on-the-field performance.

The point being that they are arbitrary rankings based on guesswork, and therefore an invalid measure of current talent. I tend to think Clemson is slightly more talented than OSU, especially on offense. Defensively the gap narrows. Obviously not 31-0 more talented, but sometimes the way a game...

You can't use recruiting rankings as an indicator of current talent, it's only a projection of potential talent. For example, do you think Curtis Grant was more talented than AJ Hawk?