• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Iowa Post Game Thoughts

LordJeffBuck

Illuminatus Emeritus
Staff member
BP Recruiting Team
Okay, the Buckeyes just won their fifth straight Big Ten championship and earned their fifth straight trip to a BCS bowl game. So why am I not excited by this 27-24 win over Iowa? Maybe it's because winning the conference and going to a major bowl is becoming so damned ordinary. Yeah, I know that we're bound for the Rose Bowl - the Granddaddy of them all - but we've been to three national championship games (2002, 2006, 2007), three Fiesta Bowls (2003, 2005, 2008), and one Sugar Bowl (1998) since our last trip to Pasadena (1996), so it's not like we are long-suffering fans when it comes to meaningful post-season action. Maybe we're like the rich guy who finds a $100 bill in the street and doesn't even bother to bend down and pick it up - after a while, it's hard for the successful to get excited about even more success. Maybe we need a season like 2004 to get our priorities back in order ... but on second thought, I'd really rather not go there. Winning another Big Ten championship and going to another BCS bowl may be just a little bit boring and commonplace these days, but it's certainly better than the alternative.

A side note on the Rose Bowl.... I suppose that the Rose Bowl should still have a bit of special significance for us Ohio State fans, but we won't even get a shot at our traditional West Coast rival this year. With Southern Cal out of contention, we'll see Oregon, or Stanford, or Arizona, or ... who cares? It's just another more-or-less meaningless bowl game against another more-or-less meaningless opponent. Let's bring back the good old days (1967 to 1979), when the Rose Bowl was the de facto national championship game no less than seven times (1967, 1968, 1970, 1972, 1974, 1975, 1979). Today, the Rose Bowl is just another multi-million dollar pay out from the BCS slush fund, nothing more. Only the BCS championship game means anything anymore, and since we're not going there, I don't really care where we go ... at least, I don't care as much as I should.

Now back to Iowa.... Maybe my lack of excitement over the conference-clinching win comes from the fact that no season is truly a success until after we beat Michigan. Even if the Buckeyes would have played a great game yesterday and beaten Iowa 38 to 10, it still would have been a Taco Bell win ... you know what I mean, satisfying for about five minutes, but leaving you completely unfulfilled and hungry for more. Yeah, no one can take those Roses away now, but somehow they won't smell quite so sweet if the Buckeyes fall in Ann Arbor next Saturday. The Game should be another romp, the Buckeyes are more talented at every position (okay, maybe not punter), and the Wolverines have probably already quit on their lamebrain soon-to-be lame duck head coach ... but there's always a chance that the Weasels will summon that last ounce of collective courage, will muster that final dram of combined character, will don their mighty winged helmets ans superman capes, and finally play like the champions that they have always dreamed about. For the Weasels' entire season is on the line ... I know that they are trying to become the first Michigan team to post back-to-back losing seasons since 1962-63 ... that they are going for their worst Big Ten record since they were shut out (0-5) in 1936 ... that they are on the verge of their worst defensive season ever (they need to surrender at least 39 points next week to eclispe last season's total of 347 points allowed) ... that they are trying to become bowl ineligible yet again ... I know all that. But I also know that the Weasels might just forget about the record books, might put the accolades aside, might forgo their rightful place in history ... and actually try to win The Game. So, the season's not over yet ... still some work to do, still some business to accomplish. It's Weasel season!

Or maybe my lack of excitement over the Iowa game stems from the Iowa game itself, which was ... well, let me put it to you this way. There's no such thing as a bad win ... especially if it's over a ranked team ... especially if it clinches a Big Ten title ... especially if it sends you to a BCS bowl ... but last night was pretty damned close. Some people have said that Jim Tressel is playing chess while everyone else is playing checkers ... but sometimes it seems like he is trying to win the game with just his pawns and nothing else.

From a fan's persepctive, last night's game was simply brutal. That was the kind of game where we should have been singing "Nah nah nah, nah nah nah, hey hey, goodbye!" to Iowa throughout the final minutes ... should have been counting down the final seconds in unison ... should have been setting our couches on fire before Terrelle Pryor took his final knee in the victory formation. But, noooooo! Our team, our beloved Buckeyes, had to turn a rout into a nail-biter with some incredibly ... unfortunate ... plays down the stretch.

You know, if the Buckeyes had begun their meltdown with ten minutes left in the third quarter instead of with ten minutes left in the fourth, then we might have had Michigan State 1998 all over again. Instead, we had Navy 2009 all over again. The Buckeyes take a two-score lead in the fourth quarter, they have their opponent on the ropes, 99 and 44/100 percent dead and buried, and then they give up a huge play (85-yard TD pass versus Navy, 99-yard kick-off return versus Iowa) to let the bad guys right back into the game. It's almost like watching a horror movie sometimes ... you know, Freddie Krueger, or Michael Myers, or Jason being shot up, hacked apart, burnt to a crisp only to return fully reanimated over and over and over again. But in any right and proper horror flick, the good guys always prevail in the final minutes and live happily ever after ... at least until the next sequel. And that's what happened again last night ... we survived ... just barely ... but we survived.

Okay, as far as the game itself, Pryor was okay, the running backs were pretty good, the ... oh, the Hell with it. You watched the game - you saw what I did. You saw the most vanilla defensive schemes possible against a rookie quarterback, making his first ever college start, who was 9 of 27 for 82 yards and an interception last week in relief ... and you saw that same inexperienced rookie quarterback look like Joey Elliot for most of the game. The only time that Vandenberg really looked like a kid with no clue was in the overtime period when he threw an incompletion, took a ten-yard sack, and tossed an interception on what amounted to a Hail Mary pass. Why the difference between regulation and overtime? Were nerves finally starting to set in? Or was Ohio State dialing up the heat a few degrees? (BTW, thank you Doug Worthington - you deserve a dozen roses for that effort). Maybe the Buckeyes should have pressured Vandenberg right from the start, blitzing him early and often and from every conceivable angle, instead of letting him sit back in the pocket and get his confidence early by completing easy tosses into a soft zone. But then again, maybe letting the dogs loose from the first play of the game would have been too checker-like....

And the offensive game plan really wasn't a whole lot better. Yes, the running game was working, and I'm all for that, but do you maybe think that it might have been a good idea to mix in a play action pass or two every now and then? Like once a quarter, perhaps? We all know the main tenets of Tresselball - strong running game, stout defense, win the field position battle, make no mistakes on offense - but one of the aspects of Tresselball that is often overlooked is making big plays on offense. To use a boxing analogy, Tresselball is a series body blows with a haymaker thrown in now and then ... and when the haymakers connect, there's a good chance that you can get a knock-out, just like at Penn State last weekend. But we saw no haymakers yesterday ... no shots downfield, no reverses, very little play action, nothing to keep Iowa from absorbing body blow after body blow until the final bell, nothing to make Iowa "tap out" and say "no mas". Maybe if Iowa's defense had been burned earlier in the game ... or even tested ... then maybe Ohio State isn't running into a pile of bodies in the fourth quarter trying to set up a game-clinching field goal.

And that brings me to my players of the game. No one really stood out on either side of the ball ... at least not for the right reasons ... but the offensive line did a very solid job under very difficult circumstances. When everyone on the Horseshoe knew what was coming on every single play, the OL still kept mashing and gashing and gnashing the Iowa front seven. Ohio State ran the ball 51 times for 229 yards (4.5 average) and 3 touchdowns against an Iowa defense that had been giving up only 119 rushing yards per game and 3.5 yards per carry, and had surrendered just 5 rushing touchdowns all season. Despite the fact that the box was stacked against them all night long, that a banged-up Pryor wasn't a threat to run outside, and that the offensive scheme was virtually devoid of any plays designed to loosen up the Hawkeye defense, the Buckeye offensive line kept grinding out the tough yards all night long. Kudos to them. To everyone else, there's always next week....

Now for some fun stuff....

1. Ohio State has won five Big Ten championships in a row. How far back does each other Big Ten team have to go to claim five conference titles? Well, here is your answer:
Michigan - 13 years (titles in 2004, 2003, 2000, 1998, 1997)
Iowa - 29 years[sup]1[/sup] (titles in 2004, 2002, 1990, 1985, 1981)
Michigan State - 36 years (titles in 1990, 1987, 1978, 1966, 1965)
Wisconsin - 51 years (titles in 1999, 1998, 1993, 1962, 1959)
Illinois - 57 years (titles in 2001, 1990, 1983, 1963, 1953)
Minnesota - 72 years (titles in 1967, 1960, 1941, 1940, 1938)
Purdue - 78 years (titles in 2000, 1967, 1952, 1943, 1932)
Northwestern - 79 years (titles in 2000, 1996, 1995, 1936, 1931)
Penn State - never (titles in 2008, 2005, 1994)
Indiana - never (titles in 1967, 1945)​

Pretty amazing stuff that speaks volumes about Ohio State's excellence ... and the Big Ten's lack thereof.

2. Is anyone still impressed with Jacory Harris and the Hurricanes' high-flying offensive attack?

Is anyone still impressed with Matt Barkley's poise and command of the Trojans' pro-style offense?

Does anyone still think that Tim Tebow is the greatest player in the history of college football?

Does anyone still want to trade Tate Forcier for Terrelle Pryor? Or maybe you're all on that James Vandenberg band wagon now....

The point is that the football media, just like the media in general, is all about hyperbole, because hyperbole is what sells to the attention-deficit, thrill-a-minute generation that has been raised on cable TV, the internet, video games, and iPhones.

Tony Pike for Heisman!!!1!!1!

Or is it Zach Collaros now...?

3. With the Buckeyes out of the national title hunt, I'm rooting for TCU, preferably in a show down against Texas. But unless something unforseen happens, it looks like the SEC champ will be in the mix yet again ... probably Alabama, who is playing the best football in the country right now.

4. Back to yesterday's game for a minute.... In 2004, the Buckeyes won a game in similar fasion, when Mike Nugent connected on a 54-yard field goal to beat Marshall 24-21 as time expired. Back then, it was a thrilling, exciting finish, one of the greatest finales of all time, and I was jumping up and down with sheer euphoria (okay, maybe that's a bit of hyperbole of my own, but you get my point) ... but six years later, I've had enough. I just want to win games the old-fashioned way, by pounding the living snot out of the opponent for sixty minutes, by running up the score, by going for two in the fourth quarter....

5. It's officially Michigan Week. 'Nuff said.
_____________________________
[sup]1[/sup] 25 years, if Iowa ends up with a co-championship this season.
 
Last edited:
LordJeffBuck;1595046; said:
Today, the Rose Bowl is just another multi-million dollar pay out from the BCS slush fund, nothing more. Only the BCS championship game means anything anymore, and since we're not going there, I don't really care where we go ... at least, I don't care as much as I should.

The BCS sows the seeds of its own irrelevance - leading to louder urging for a playoff.

On the 5th consecutive Big Ten Championship - only TSUN has a similar stretch of B10 champs or shared honors.
Their run lasted from '88 to '92. In '90 the championship was split 4 ways.

Should the Buckeyes garner another Big 10 Championship next year, or a share thereof I think they would stand alone.
 
Upvote 0
sandgk;1595060; said:
The BCS sows the seeds of its own irrelevance - leading to louder urging for a playoff.

On the 5th consecutive Big Ten Championship - only TSUN has a similar stretch of B10 champs or shared honors.
Their run lasted from '88 to '92. In '90 the championship was split 4 ways.

Should the Buckeyes garner another Big 10 Championship next year, or a share thereof I think they would stand alone.
Well, almost. Ohio State won six in a row from 1972 to 1977.
 
Upvote 0
As Buckeye fans we some times live a little too much in the past of Buckeye blowouts of every team in the Big Ten. Our history counts for little.
Now is now and things change and even Tressel (once in a great while)will admit to that. The past is just that.
I'll take a win any way we can get it! Cheat if we have to. Knock the other guy out of the game.
Just win, baby!
 
Upvote 0
2. Is anyone still impressed with Jacory Harris and the Hurricans' high-flying offensive attack?

Is anyone still impressed with Matt Barkley's poise and command of the Trojans' pro-style offense?

Does anyone still think that Tim Tebow is the greatest player in the history of college football?

Does anyone still want to trade Tate Forcier for Terrelle Pryor? Or maybe you're all on that James Vandenberg band wagon now....

The point is that the football media, just like the media in general, is all about hyperbole, because hyperbole is what sells to the attention-deficit, thrill-a-minute generation that has been raised on cable TV, the internet, video games, and iPhones.

Tony Pike for Heisman!!!1!!1!

Or is it Zach Collaros now...?

Not sure if I am supposed to input my thoughts, or if that was basically just a blog entry, but I agree with a lot of it. You are wise in the ways of the Buck.

Everyone is so concerned about 'instant gratification' and it drives me insane. I do have to say that Collaros did very well in the place of Pike, better in fact, on the same note, I really think vandenberg did well - considering we didnt pressure him at all. If they were playing USC, you know they would have blitzed him nearly every play and made him crap his pants. Instead, Tress wanted to see what this youngster had to offer, so he gave him a huge learning cushion/pocket to work with. I think if we had blitzed more, we would have seen Coleman and Homan with a pick+6 each. On a further note, I really hope that he was trying to keep pryor from getting hurt so that we can have his strength and speed in the Rose Bowl. I am almost certain that is what happened, and why playcalling was so conservative, but come on! It got a little too close for comfort.

As with TCU - they are good, and hughes is insane - looks like jevon kearse style DE. Hoping to see Texas v UF in the Champ Game - Still rooting McCoy for Heisman as his two previous opponnents should be very far from heisman talks. (Bradford and Tebow). Still think Tebow is a great college football fullback with an incredible throwing ability and quick decision making, but nowhere near the greatest to ever play NCAA FB.

Also, its 5 consecutive Big 10 titles as far as i remember.
 
Upvote 0
ou saw the most vanilla defensive schemes possible against a rookie quarterback, making his first ever college start, who was 9 of 27 for 82 yards and an interception last week in relief ... and you saw that same inexperienced rookie quarterback look like Joey Elliot for most of the game. The only time that Vandenberg really looked like a kid with no clue was in the overtime period when he threw an incompletion, took a ten-yard sack, and tossed an interception on what amounted to a Hail Mary pass. Why the difference between regulation and overtime? Were nerves finally starting to set in? Or was Ohio State dialing up the heat a few degrees? (BTW, thank you Doug Worthington - you deserve a dozen roses for that effort). Maybe the Buckeyes should have pressured Vandenberg right from the start, blitzing him early and often and from every conceivable angle, instead of letting him sit back in the pocket and get his confidence early by completing easy tosses into a soft zone. But then again, maybe letting the dogs loose from the first play of the game would have been too checker-like....

I think the answer to that is two-fold

One, for the first time all year, the front-4 weren't getting consistent pressure on every pass, especially in the first half.

Two, I think the lack of film on the guy made Heacock revert to form, which is, a basic cover-2 defense until he saw what was going on. The problem with that was it left Chimdi on an island that he'd rather forget I'm sure.

There weren't a ton of adjustments to be made IMO. I think it had a lot more to do with Iowa's offensive line played their butts off AND a slight revert to the comfortable because of the unknown on the coaches part.

Maybe if they pinned their ears back in the 2nd quarter on it's a different story, but they won. I don't care.

Fuck Michigan.
 
Upvote 0
Call me a stick in the mud if you must, but the playcalling (on both sides of the ball) yesterday really shook me. Yeah, I know, in the end it worked, but all the positive will that had been built up the previous couple weeks was flushed in my mind when we saw the absolute worst of Tresselball in the 4th quarter. Check my post history, I've been at the forefront standing up for this staff but there's no defending the indefensible. There were about 5-6 of us in the game thread who never lose our cool that came this close to losing it. Big Ten title and Rose Bowl berth on the line and that was the gameplan? Run, run 4 yard pass 5 yards behind the chains? Disheartening to me. I was really hoping going forward that we were seeing the offense and playcalling evolve. Nope.

Sorry, had to vent.
 
Upvote 0
LordJeffBuck said:
Or maybe my lack of excitement over the Iowa game stems from the Iowa game itself, which was ... well, let me put it to you this way. There's no such thing as a bad win ... especially if it's over a ranked team ... especially if it clinches a Big Ten title ... especially if it sends you to a BCS bowl ... but last night was pretty damned close. Some people have said that Jim Tressel is playing chess while everyone else is playing checkers ... but sometimes it seems like he is trying to win the game with just his pawns and nothing else.

NFBuck said:
Yeah, I know, in the end it worked, but all the positive will that had been built up the previous couple weeks was flushed in my mind when we saw the absolute worst of Tresselball in the 4th quarter. Check my post history, I've been at the forefront standing up for this staff but there's no defending the indefensible. There were about 5-6 of us in the game thread who never lose our cool that came this close to losing it. Big Ten title and Rose Bowl berth on the line and that was the gameplan? Run, run 4 yard pass 5 yards behind the chains? Disheartening to me. I was really hoping going forward that we were seeing the offense and playcalling evolve. Nope.

LordJeffBuck said:
1. Ohio State has won five Big Ten championships in a row. How far back does each other Big Ten team have to go to claim five conference titles?

Well, here is your answer:

Michigan - 13 years (titles in 2004, 2003, 2000, 1998, 1997)
Iowa - 29 years1 (titles in 2004, 2002, 1990, 1985, 1981)
Michigan State - 36 years (titles in 1990, 1987, 1978, 1966, 1965)
Wisconsin - 51 years (titles in 1999, 1998, 1993, 1962, 1959)
Illinois - 57 years (titles in 2001, 1990, 1983, 1963, 1953)
Minnesota - 72 years (titles in 1967, 1960, 1941, 1940, 1938)
Purdue - 78 years (titles in 2000, 1967, 1952, 1943, 1932)
Northwestern - 79 years (titles in 2000, 1996, 1995, 1936, 1931)
Penn State - never (titles in 2008 2005, 1994)
Indiana - never (titles in 1967, 1945)

Agree on all counts. Well done.
 
Upvote 0
One thing that I forgot to add in the original post....

In the past two weeks, Ohio State has beaten #11 Penn State and #15 Iowa. Prior to that, when was the last time that Ohio State beat ranked teams in back-to-back weeks, and who were the opponents?

Well, ironically, it was Penn State (#23) and Iowa (#13), on September 23rd and September 30th in the 2006 season.
 
Upvote 0
rosebowl.jpg
 
Upvote 0
Or was Ohio State dialing up the heat a few degrees? (BTW, thank you Doug Worthington - you deserve a dozen roses for that effort). Maybe the Buckeyes should have pressured Vandenberg right from the start, blitzing him early and often and from every conceivable angle, instead of letting him sit back in the pocket and get his confidence early by completing easy tosses into a soft zone. But then again, maybe letting the dogs loose from the first play of the game would have been too checker-like....

Agree about the fact that we should have gone after him early and often. Beat him up a little bit and then play vanilla soft defense if you want. But make him think and know that we will be coming. I don't know, I said it from the start of the game because I could see what we were doing and I didn't like it. It obviously didn't work as well as we would have liked so I don't know why we couldn't start getting after the guy.

Mental lapses at the end of the game were unexcusable. We had them by the throat!! And we let them up. Not good at all.

I am also rooting for TCU to make it to the championship.
 
Upvote 0
If you win convincingly, you're considered the class of a mediocre league. If you lose convincingly, you're overrated. If you win a close game, you're gutless (and overrated). If you lose a close game, you choked.

But if you're USC or Oklahoma and shit your bed several times in a season, you're just having a bad season.

According to the idiots who subscribe to the above train of thought, we've already lost the Rose Bowl regardless of who we play.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top