• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Former OSU track star Chris Nelloms talks about life in jail

StooGrimson

He drives around, all over the town...
http://www.daytondailynews.com/sports/content/sports/preps/daily/0530nelloms.html

Q&A WITH CHRIS NELLOMS
Former track star says he's innocent, but regrets not taking plea agreement

By Mark Gokavi
Staff Writer

LEBANON |
  • Editor's note: Mark Stegemoeller, who works at Warren Correctional Institution, helped arrange this interview with Chris Nelloms. He said Nelloms is on merit status for good behavior, is generally respected among inmates and is in the general population, which is unusual for inmates convicted of sex offenses against children. The 45-acre institution, which houses mostly Level 3 (on a scale of 1 to 5) inmates, includes notorious and dangerous criminals.
<!--endtext-->

Enlarge photo

<!-- tn -->
<!-- inset --><!--begintext-->
As a world-class sprinter, time was on Chris Nelloms' side. But as inmate A372261 at Warren Correctional Institution, time is his enemy.
Nelloms has served seven-plus years of a 40-to-life sentence for four child-sex crimes against a young girl who was in his care. He entered prison Feb. 26, 1999, and has no chance of parole until 2039. He'll be 67.
Nelloms, a former Dunbar High School and Ohio State track and field standout, contends he is not guilty. A message left for his accuser, now 19, was not returned.
During a recent 75-minute interview, Nelloms made repeated references to religion, family, his Ohio State days and his career.
Q What's a typical day?
A After I read my Bible, I get into my praise and worship. After that, it's the count time, which is 10 o'clock. I'm on merit status, so we're first to call for chow. (Then) I go to work, which is at recreation. My rec starts at 12:30. We've got count again at 3 o'clock. I go back to rec. I also go to church. ... Nine o'clock is when count is, but I normally get back about 8.
Q When do you fall asleep?
A Once the doors lock, my cellmate goes to sleep and I get into my Bible a little bit more and I pray. There's time when I lay there and I think of what could have been. And I think of what was. But the majority of the time, you make the best of the environment that you're in and use the strength that God has given you to make it through.
Q Is there ever a time when you wake up and you don't believe that you're here?
A I'm not ... I don't believe that I'm doing the 40 years to life. I don't believe God saved me from being shot in '92, five minutes from being dead, to ... do the rest of my life in prison. I'm here for preparation. I'm taking that preparation the best way that I can to prepare myself for the streets. ... I may not be free physically, but I am free emotionally and mentally. My body's incarcerated behind walls but I'm free within myself.
Q Does it seem like you've served seven-plus years?
A To be honest, it just seems like yesterday. At the only point where it seems like I've done seven-and-a-half years almost, is when my daughter (Allyia Nelloms) comes to visit. I remember when she was an infant. Now she's 7 years old. That's the only time when time really catches up with me, because you see it from year to year to year. You realize that you are missing out on a lot of things.
Q What other communication do you have with family and friends?
A That's a hard one. Other than my agent and my mother and (ex-Dunbar track coach) Randy (Waggoner) and Mrs. (Evonne) Lyons (one of his youth track coaches) and my father — all my friends, I haven't heard anything from. I get some letters from some fans or people that I haven't seen in 10, 15 years, they may send me an encouraging letter or note.
Q What is the worst thing about being in prison?
A (Long pause) Before I came to prison, I was in a county (jail) and a gentleman said, 'You need to watch your back.' He tried to explain some of the things that carry on in prison. But, today's prison is not like yesterday's prison used to be. If you notice, they call it an institution. It's not a penitentiary anymore. ... I try to limit myself away from a lot of things. I try to present myself every day the way I would want to be respected and represented in the inmates' eyes.
Q Do you have track competitions here?
A We have a Fourth of July event. We have the mile, the three-mile, the 4x1, the 4x2, the 50 and the 100. ... Yeah. Unfortunately, I'm not allowed to run anymore.
Q Why?
A (Laughing) Because every time I sign up, don't nobody sign up to run against me. ... The people who head it, they felt like it would be best if I didn't do it so everybody else can enjoy themselves and do it.
Q Do most inmates know who you are and your past?
A Some didn't. It came about once the track and field actually took place. Even though I'm 34 years old, I feel like when I came to prison, I was a child coming out of the womb coming into a new world. As childish or stupid as it may sound, I didn't know that this was actually the way that it is. I've learned a lot.
Q What do you miss most?
A (Pause) I miss my children. I miss my family the most. Umm, regardless of what the courts, what the judge, what the jury, what the community, what people say, I am a family-type person. I love my kids. I took responsibility for my (two) children. I hate that I missed an opportunity to be with my children. I hate that my career was taken away from me in my prime. I was 27 years old. (Sprinters) can make it until they're about 36 years old. It's over after that.
Q Are you still adamant about your innocence?
A Oh, very — 100 percent. That's the only thing that's keeping me alive, you know. My innocence. It's hard to know that you're incarcerated for something that you didn't do. But it's also hard to know that, wow, they offered me three years (Articles in the Dayton Daily News reported 10 years) for a plea, knowing that I was facing 100 years. And I say to myself, 'Why didn't you take that three-year plea and maybe you could have been home?' ... Like I told my mother and I told my attorney and I told the judge — and I still stand (on it) — I did not commit this crime. I'm going to fight 'til the last nail is driven in.
Q What do you want people to know about you or think when they hear your name?
A As far as track goes, I don't think that's going to go away. Incarceration, anything that I could ever have done in life could never change that. That's something God gave me. He gave me a gift. I didn't abuse it. So when it comes down to the track and field part, I think that's something that will always be spoken about. And I'm grateful about that.
Q
Do you hear from your college friends?
A No, I don't really hear much from them. I've learned that time goes on. I'm incarcerated. Being incarcerated, I guess, this is what comes with it. You lose your family. You lose friends. Death comes upon you. People pass away. So you lose a lot of things. You have to find yourself and make the best of what it is. If you are looking for letters and people to come and visit you, you're going to lose yourself.
 
DDN

5/31/06

FALLEN FROM GRACE
Former Dunbar star Nelloms' name on track circuit again

By Mark Gokavi
Staff Writer

Chris Nelloms' name echoes at Ohio track meets.

The former Dunbar and Ohio State sprinter holds many invitational, district, regional and state records. When an event is announced and his name is given as the all-time best, the chatter can turn to two things.

First, people marvel at his amazing times and duels against Euclid's Robert Smith. Second, people wonder if Nelloms is still in jail for child-sex crimes.

He is, serving 40 years without parole at Warren Correctional Institution near Lebanon. He has been in prison since 1999.

Nelloms' name has been uttered even more than usual this year as Piqua's Brandon Saine nears some of Nelloms' times.

Saine, a junior, could be the first since Nelloms in 1988 to win the big-school state 100-, 200- and 400-meter dashes.

Nelloms recently agreed to an interview. Supervised by one unarmed official, Nelloms wore a white, long-sleeve shirt under a blue, short-sleeve shirt, blue pants and white shoes. At 5-foot-9, 168-pounds, the 34-year-old still looks like a sprinter.

He was alternatively upbeat, reflective and emotional. He talked about track, his life in prison, his case and his regrets.

When his name is announced now, it's usually during a roll call of inmates.

Asked if he had advice for Saine, Nelloms sighed.

"I guess the way that I am right now, my advice to him couldn't deal with anything in track and field," Nelloms said.

"The advice that was given to me — by my elders — it seems like it still, for some reason, backfired on me. I considered myself trying to do everything that I was supposed to do — go to school, stay away from the streets — but here I am still sitting in prison for all this time."
 
Upvote 0
This still blows my mind. He lived right across the hall during my freshman year and never would have thought about him doing this.

He was very polite ,ladies loved him and funny. I use to challenge him everyday to race me but, giving me 10 or 20 lead,to give me a chance. He still smoked me.

This is onething that I guess I'll never understand. why?
 
Upvote 0
yeah. what a shame. such a crazy world.

his high-school track times are absolutely insane.

20.47 in the 200, 45.59 in the 400, and 13.30 in the 110 39" hurdles (and i think he didn't run hurdles until his senior year, but i could be wrong)

there are many high schools in this country that can't field a 4x1 relay team to go under 45 seconds. Dude could do it by HIMSELF. Unbelievable.

I once saw derrick williams of canton glenoak walk everybody down with a 46.2 4x4 anchor leg, and i thought that was the most incredible thing I had ever seen on the track....and nelloms would have had no trouble whatsoever beating him.

ginn's best open 400 was 46.57, his best 4x4 split was 45.3
 
Upvote 0
http://www.daytondailynews.com/localnews/content/localnews/daily/081306pittsa1.html

Father's denials of rape enrage woman

Former Dunbar High track star's conviction in 1999 hasn't healed Pitts' wounds.

By Mark Gokavi
Staff Writer
TROTWOOD — Terria Pitts didn't want her young children to see her upset.
<!--endclickprintexclude-->Photos

Click thumbnails for larger view and caption
Enlarge photo

<!-- tn -->
<!-- inset --><!--begintext-->Three-year-old Paul and 6-month-old Triniti were up way past their bedtime, so Terria walked a few steps onto her apartment complex's lawn.
There, on the grass, she cried. Her stomach churned as she recalled the newspaper stories she read about the man convicted of repeatedly raping her when she was a little girl.
That man is Chris Nelloms, her father.
"I was reading the article and I'm thinking, 'Why does he keep sending me through this?' " Pitts said. "Why does he keep opening up wounds when he knows it's true. ... What he fails to realize is he's ruined my life."
Nelloms, an ex-Dunbar High School and Ohio State University sprinting standout, maintained his innocence in a May 30 article in the Dayton Daily News. Nelloms was convicted of eight (later reduced to four) counts of child-sex crimes. He's served seven-plus years of his 40-to-life sentence and is at the Warren Correctional Institution near Lebanon.
Pitts, 19, said her life has been altered by acts she testified Nelloms committed when she was between 8 and 11 years old.
Pitts contacted the Dayton Daily News, wanting to give her side of the story. Rape victims, especially minors, are rarely named in most media outlets without extenuating circumstances. At the Dayton Daily News, a (now adult) victim asking to be identified is an exception.
"I wanted to let the public know that Chris Nelloms is not innocent," Pitts said. "He's so great in track and field, but he's not great in other things he's done. He's not being incarcerated for something he didn't do; he's being incarcerated for something he did do.
"There was evidence. I just want people to know that I'm not a liar. I am being honest about everything that I say, everything I have said. But this man actually believes in his mind that he has not done this, but it's the truth."
Related

 
Upvote 0
I was at the State meet when Nellums went head-to-head with Robert Smith. It was a performance I'll never forget, establishing records at the state and national level. What a shame that the track where Nellums and Owens had their greatest high school days no longer exsists.
 
Upvote 0
Sex offenses against kids is as tough an issue as you can get.

I used to work with a guy who worked on the side as a clown. He was accused of fondling some young girl. Ruined his life. Had to leave the state. Years later she recanted.

It is also the reason I quit coaching soccer. After my son was through my neighbor's asked me to coach their daughter's team. I really enjoyed it. But too many times parents weren't there after practice and I ended up taking their daughters home - alone.

My wife kept reminding me what was at stake. It could be as simple as ticking a parent off for lack of playing time. Even helping girls who had never worn shin guards became a concern. So I hung it up.

All that said, it is an area where we have to err on the side of the kids. Nobody meets the profile of somebody you would expect to do this. And I can't imagine anyone admitting it - even to themselves.

I feel bad for Nelloms even if he is guilty. (This isn't something you decide to do - it is something you are compelled to do against everything you know is right.)

But in an imperfect world this is the best we can do.
 
Upvote 0
because they chose to take one person's word over anothers. they had DNA options, they had this option before, and they chose to believe that Nelloms was the one not telling the truth, not the girl who now has multiple children and the same claim as she did years ago. So why not see if she is being honest or not. if it comes out that maybe she wasnt such a victim, I am sure that some defensive attourney will be attracted to getting this man out of prison. Whats this mean for you or me? nothing really. but far too often are innocent people placed behind bars, and I would like to know if that persists in this circumstance.
 
Upvote 0
You want the truth? Good, and good luck trying to prove to a court of law that a polygraph has lead you there.
I have no problem with your desire to see a firm and fair assessment of the facts - but, the fact is a polygraph isn't the tool to use.
OK - you express a desire to find out the truth. That does not answer me how a polygraph will open a door to the truth.
OK - you state that "they had this option before" whoever they are. That also does not answer why a flawed and inadmissible interrogation tool will open a door leading to the truth. Moreover, if a polygraph was previously available to law enforcement or the defense team why was it not used? Answer because it is not admissible, and hence largely viewed as worthless, or, worse yet, prejudicial.
You imply that you believe a polygraph will tell us if she (or Chris) is telling the truth. If that was so then this type of evidence would be welcomed with open arms in a court of law. It isn't, because it cannot tell us any truth with an acceptable level of certainty.
 
Upvote 0
Thanks for the link to a polygraph examiners website extolling the virtues of polygraph examinations.
All the pain you exude for Chris' present plight aside, my first response is that the NRC in an independent study, to determine the value of polygraph testing, concluded that:

Basic Science


Polygraph Accuracy Almost a century of research in scientific psychology and physiology provides little basis for the expectation that a polygraph test could have extremely high accuracy. The physiological responses measured by the polygraph are not uniquely related to deception. That is, the responses measured by the polygraph do not all reflect a single underlying process: a variety of psychological and physiological processes, including some that can be consciously controlled, can affect polygraph measures and test results. Moreover, most polygraph testing procedures allow for uncontrolled variation in test administration (e.g., creation of the emotional climate, selecting questions) that can be expected to result in variations in accuracy and that limit the level of accuracy that can be consistently achieved.
and further ..

Future Potential The inherent ambiguity of the physiological measures used in the polygraph suggest that further investments in improving polygraph technique and interpretation will bring only modest improvements in accuracy.
and it continues ...

Overestimation For the reasons cited, we believe that estimates of polygraph accuracy from existing research overestimate accuracy in actual practice, even for specific-incident investigations. The evidence is insufficient to allow a quantitative estimate of the size of the overestimate.
Finally - and perhaps most damning for this open door we keep hearing about ..

Utility Polygraph examinations may have utility to the extent that they can elicit admissions and confessions, deter undesired activity, and instill public confidence. However, such utility is separate from polygraph validity. There is substantial anecdotal evidence that admissions and confessions occur in polygraph examinations, but no direct scientific evidence assessing the utility of the polygraph. Indirect evidence supports the idea that a technique will exhibit utility effects if examinees and the public believe that there is a high likelihood of a deceptive person being detected and that the costs of being judged deceptive are substantial. Any technique about which people hold such beliefs is likely to exhibit utility, whether or not it is valid. For example, there is no evidence to suggest that admissions and confessions occur more readily with the polygraph than with a bogus pipeline—an interrogation accompanying the use of an inert machine that the examinee believes to be a polygraph. In the long run, evidence that a technique lacks validity will surely undercut its utility.
You should read that last very carefully, for what it really says in layman's terms is this:

You cannot trust a polygraph exam result, it doesn't have 100% accuracy, not anywhere sufficiently close. The other reason why one should not trust the polygraph is because it is like an empty vessel from which one can pour a specific and desired conclusion.

Yet you think this will open a door?

The straw-man politics about Bush aside, nobody wishes to see another wrongfully imprisoned, and that has nothing to do with personal or national pride. It is instead a simple matter of the fairness that all reasonable people seek in life.
So what this boils down to in my view is this, what is it you want for Chris? Is it simply your goal to sew seeds of doubt and earn him a day in the media, or do you seek fairness and justice leading to a new trial and (you fervently hope) his exoneration?
If it is your goal to seek the truth in this case then means other than a polygraph are your best friend. If it is your goal to cast inadmissible doubt (not suspicion - there is a critical difference) on the matter, then go ahead, knock yourself out and have Chris take an polygraph test, have the female victim also take one, if she is so willing, while your are at this for what good it will do (none).
Let be honest then about the goals. Doubt is certainly what you and hhs2cbus are seeking in promoting polygraph testing, not truth. Which is an important factor, as only the truth can set an innocent man free in a court of law. Only the truth, in the form of new circumstantial or physical evidence, would be admissible in a court of law in support of an appeal or retrial.

The polygraph test would do nothing to further your real cause and, with all due respect, you both are barking completely up the wrong tree by cleaving to the idea that it will serve Chris well.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top